On Jan 31, 2011, at 5:55 PM, Michael Letterle
wrote:
> Anyway to at least have the domain redirect to the github wiki or
> something? Or a static "Coming soon" page?
IMO, the easiest and fastest way to get the site back up is this:
http://pages.github.com/
It would also make it easy for folks
For some reason Jimmy's reply didn't show up in my inbox until I sent my
reply. Sorry for the duplicate explanation.
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Jimmy Schementi wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> Not sure I follow. IronRuby does support this via DotNetClassName =
> Object.const_get("lower_case_dotnet_clas
I disagree. You don't need to be able to modify the .NET source code to get
this to work. You can use Ruby to make Ruby happy. The reason for the
friction is because .NET != Ruby. When you create a class in Ruby, you are
actually creating an object that inherits from Class, and then you are
creatin
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Michael Letterle <
michael.lette...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Unless we target Mono >.>
>
+1
___
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Michael Letterle <
michael.lette...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Regardless, I'd rather see a nice README first. :)
>
+1
___
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-c
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 4:22 AM, Andrius Bentkus <
andrius.bent...@rwth-aachen.de> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 1:57 AM, Michael Letterle <
> michael.lette...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> FWIW having separate IronRuby, IronPython, and Common repos that are
>> sub moduled(is that a word?) would mak
tions
are fundamentally different, then by all means continue.
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 10:32 AM, Ryan Riley wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 5:44 AM, Mike Moore wrote:
>
>> On Oct 23, 2010, at 1:30 AM, Tomas Matousek <
>> tomas.matou...@microsoft.com> wrote:
>>
>&
On Oct 23, 2010, at 1:30 AM, Tomas Matousek
wrote:
> I don’t understand how three distinct github repos that I need to map into
> some directories on my disk whose relative location to each other is
> hardcoded in some scripts in each are better than a single repo that has a
> well-defined st
On Oct 22, 2010, at 10:13 PM, Michael Letterle
wrote:
> Uh.. you know it doesn't, right?
Obviously I don't. :)
___
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
On Oct 22, 2010, at 10:00 PM, Jim Deville wrote:
> The Rake files were deleted because they were hard to maintain and redundant.
Not all of them.
http://github.com/ironruby/ironruby/blob/master/Rakefile
___
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rub
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Michael Letterle <
michael.lette...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> http://github.com/ironruby/ironruby
>
> My understanding is that Codeplex is used only for end user
> distribution and bug tracking
>
Good to know. Last time I was paying attention this was not the case. Th
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Tomas Matousek <
tomas.matou...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> 2) It is not a holdover. It makes a lot of sense actually for at least
> the following reasons:
>
> a) Some IronRuby tests test interop between these languages. So there is a
> direct dependency. When you deb
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Jonathan Allen wrote:
> I would caution you against moving too far away from Microsoft Technology,
> lest you alienate Windows developers.
>
I don't think Windows developers could be anymore alienated from IronRuby.
> 1. If this project is going to be owned by M
With a brave new world ahead for IronRuby, what do you all think about the
following ideas?
1) Move to GitHub - I won't likely contribute if I have to use CodePlex. And
I'd like to contribute. Can we do like the rest of Mono and make GitHub the
central repository and source of all truth? Please?
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter <
charles.nut...@sun.com> wrote:
> It gets easier :) Dig up videos of my RubyConf 2005 talk or Tom and my
> JavaOne 2006 talks. Dismal.
>
Does a video of your RubyConf 2005 session exist?!? I can find audio and
slides, but the only video I've
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 3:37 AM, Ivan Porto Carrero wrote:
>
> Then I did one at an Italian Alt.NET gathering. I tried to watch it last
> night and had to stop because it is more scary than a horror movie. At least
> now I know I suck at presenting I can learn and do it better next time. I
> should
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Mike Moore wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 3:37 AM, Ivan Porto Carrero wrote:
>
>>
>> Then I did one at an Italian Alt.NET gathering. I tried to watch it last
>> night and had to stop because it is more scary than a horror movie. At least
Good job guys!
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Jimmy Schementi <
jimmy.scheme...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> All,
>
> I want to congratulate two new "Microsoft Most Valuable Professionals"
> (MVP), Michael Letterle and Peter Bacon Darwin! They are IronRuby MVPs,
> though officially it says "Visual C
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Tomas Matousek <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm thinking of something like:
>
> myTexture = content.load of(Texture2D), "mytexture"
>
> I.e. we would add Kernel#of method that takes a list of classes/modules and
> returns a special object representing generic par
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 5:43 PM, Jim Deville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We still need contribution agreements, but that is no different than Apache,
> Mozilla, and other major Open Source projects.
>
> So is it the lieutenants' responsibility to ensure that whoever they pull
code from has an a
Whoo hoo! Great job guys! This is very exciting. One question though, will
folks still need to have a signed agreement to contribute code?
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Jim Deville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The IronRuby project is a community project, and has contributors inside
> and outs
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 11:20 PM, Curt Hagenlocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Now it turns out that method names are one of the places where Ruby doesn't
> draw this distinction, but I'd guess that many Ruby programmers look at any
> identifier starting with a capital letter and think "that's a c
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 7:11 PM, Ted Milker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I much prefer camel case and .NET guidelines for naming than underscore and
> lowercase hell.
You'd like it better if you'd call it "snake case". :)
___
Ironruby-core mailing li
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 6:54 PM, Curt Hagenlocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> We're thinking now that we're going to go with the mangled version of the
> name instead of the originally cased-version. "Dispose" just doesn't look
> Rubyish enough. Any objections?
>
No objections. I'd prefer def d
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Curt Hagenlocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> There's quite a difference between a development environment like
> ASP.NETthat's fully supported by Microsoft and one that we make available on
> an
> as-is basis for the community to play with – and maybe take owner
And Scott Guthrie said Microsoft had no interest in enabling Rails to run in
IronRuby... :)
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 1:52 PM, Tomas Matousek <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's a top secret experimental ASP.NET HttpHandler that dispatches to a
> Rails application J
>
>
>
> Tomas
>
>
>
> *From:* [E
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Curt Hagenlocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> > I agree, Anders doesn't allow the argument to be so convincing.
> > However, I generally go 2.0 > 3.0 > Ruby - Ruby still better :)
>
> Sorry about the pendantry, but I think you wanted that to say
> "2.0 < 3.0 <
Microsoft is already starting the process of merging the DLR into the CLR?
Is the DLR considered "done"?
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Curt Hagenlocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> There's going to be some merging of classes as parts of the DLR move into
> the next version of the CLR. The alt
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Curt Hagenlocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> We think that there's more than enough value on the .NET platform to retain
> developers.
>
> Quite frankly, if you're looking to write Ruby or Python code that doesn't
> take advantage of .NET features (such as cross-
I left a comment on your blog, but I'll answer here as well.
IronRuby adds the Ruby Enumerable mixin to IEnumerable objects, which allows
for CLR lists and collections to act more like Ruby arrays. And the new
methods you add to CLR classes in IronRuby will not be available when
calling them from
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 8:09 AM, Rahil Kantharia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> But when it comes to Asp.Net MVC with IronRuby, one cannot survive
> without a great IDE, thats sure.
>
I think you *need *an IDE like Visual Studio for writing ASP.NET MVC web
apps because ASP.NET MVC is a web framewor
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 4:33 AM, Ben Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think 'jumping ship' is the wrong way to think about it. C# is still
> a very useful language, however in certain situations Ruby is the more
> logical choice. I don't see this as either\or, but a way to extend
> your toolset
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 12:43 AM, Softmind Technology <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Not much cannot be done, without a good IDE support.
>
The same reason you think this is the same reason Ruby will have a hard
time succeeding in the .NET community. Ruby didn't get to where it is today
with overw
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 2:39 PM, John Lam (IRONRUBY) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> We have a bunch of work to do to land ASP.NET MVC + IronRuby for my Tech
> Ed talk. I'll have a blog post about that likely on the Friday just before
> my talk.
>
Isn't Tech·Ed this week?
http://www.microsoft.com/ev
I think the issue is vetting the contribution. Microsoft wants to protect
itself and make sure that anything in the "core" hasn't violated an existing
copyright. As I understand it, Microsoft considers it prohibitivly expensive
to ensure that all contributions aren't already copywritten, which is w
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 10:06 AM, Michael Letterle <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You don't need Ruby if you're compiling via Visual Studio or MSBuild.
I may be wrong, but I think you do need Ruby. You can't just compile the
code you get from SVN. You need to run 'rake gen' to generate the othe
I checked version 77 out to my work PC, which is running .NET 2.0. I ran
"rake compile" from my SDK Command prompt and everything compiled just
fine.I changed the .sln file to "Format Version 09.00" so I could open it
with VS 2K5. I can compile from VS just fine as well. However, I can't run
rbx
ries\Builtins\Kernel.cs:145:in `Exit':
exit (SystemExit)
from
e:\Sandbox\IronRuby\src\IronRuby.Libraries\Builtins\Kernel.cs:133:in `Exit'
from :0:in `main'
from :0:in `Initialize##7'
>>>
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Mike Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTE
small tweaks here and there but they shouldn’t be chang
ing much in the future either.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
] On Behalf Of Mike Moore
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 1:20 PM
To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: [Ironruby-core] Shiny New Code
Does anyone kno
Does anyone know when is the source code available on
http://dynamicsilverlight.net/ going to be committed to the RubyForge SVN
repo?
Also, it looks like the DLR hosting API has changed. For example, the
example code on the IronRuby Wiki (
http://ironruby.rubyforge.org/wiki/wiki.pl?ExecutingIronR
Hi Rahil, I believe IronRuby support in ASP.NET is planned, similar to how
IronPython is supported in ASP.NET now. But we just aren't there yet.
Scott Hanselman gave a session at the ALT.NET Conference last October
showing how he got DLR languages wired into the ASP.NET MVC framework. You
can fi
I believe the consensus from September was to follow JRuby's lead and base
the implementation on System.IO.Compression as much as possible, and code
anything that was needed to get it compatible with the Ruby library.
http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ironruby-core/2007-September/24.html
On Thu,
42 matches
Mail list logo
