Re: [Ironruby-core] Fwd: WorkItem Issue #6095 - "IronRuby 1.1.3 Can't count"

2011-05-07 Thread Nicholas Radford
> > Quick question guys, when pushing this to my repo on github, should I > push to a topic branch or push to master? > Well I pushed it to a topic branch, just in case you guys required changes :) As the contributing documentation says, would someone mind giving me a code review? Code can be fo

Re: [Ironruby-core] Fwd: WorkItem Issue #6095 - "IronRuby 1.1.3 Can't count"

2011-05-07 Thread Nicholas Radford
On 5 May 2011 09:32, Nicholas Radford wrote: >>> I'm partial to option 2. As Ruby is already a slow language, we should try >>> to optimize it wherever possible. In addition, 2 keeps to the trend in other >>> .NET languages. For example, I believe LINQ takes adva

Re: [Ironruby-core] Fwd: WorkItem Issue #6095 - "IronRuby 1.1.3 Can't count"

2011-05-05 Thread Nicholas Radford
>> I'm partial to option 2. As Ruby is already a slow language, we should try >> to optimize it wherever possible. In addition, 2 keeps to the trend in other >> .NET languages. For example, I believe LINQ takes advantage of existing >> methods on Lists when it can. > > Likewise. Because arrays are

[Ironruby-core] Fwd: WorkItem Issue #6095 - "IronRuby 1.1.3 Can't count"

2011-05-04 Thread Nicholas Radford
Hey all,    I thought I'd look at issue #6095 on codeplex (http://ironruby.codeplex.com/workitem/6095) as my first contribution.    Having a dig through the code lead me to ArrayOps which then lead me IListOps in the IronRuby.Libraries project.    I noticed IListOps.Length had the [RubyMethod("c

[Ironruby-core] Hi guys

2011-05-03 Thread Nicholas Radford
hi guys, just wondering if this is still the right list to post to as I wish to start contributing to the project. -- Nik Radford ___ Ironruby-core mailing list Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core