t; file handling (so that static file requests are not dispatched to Rails).
>
>
>
> Tomas
>
>
>
> *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Mike Moore
> *Sent:* Friday, October 17, 2008 2:06 PM
> *To:* ironruby-core@rubyforge.or
Mike Moore
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 2:06 PM
To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] Code Review: IronRails2
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Curt Hagenlocher <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
There's quite a difference between a d
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 2:09 PM, Curt Hagenlocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> There's quite a difference between a development environment like
> ASP.NETthat's fully supported by Microsoft and one that we make available on
> an
> as-is basis for the community to play with – and maybe take owner
ementation, and by
definition, that's going to be able to run Rails.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Moore
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 1:04 PM
To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] Code Review: IronRails2
And Scott Guthrie said M
>
> Tomas
>
>
>
> *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Eric Nicholson
> *Sent:* Friday, October 17, 2008 11:48 AM
> *To:* ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Ironruby-core] Code Review: IronRails2
>
>
>
> Now wait j
Can you tell that we all just got back from lunch? :)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tomas Matousek
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 12:52 PM
To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] Code Review: IronRails2
It's a top secret experimental AS
nruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] Code Review: IronRails2
Now wait just a minute
:)
You can't casually mention "IronRails changes look good" on the list without
any indication of what IronRails is. That sounds far too exciting to pass up.
Can someone explain wha
It's a top secret experimental ASP.NET HttpHandler that dispatches to a Rails
application :)
Tomas
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Nicholson
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 11:48 AM
To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] Code R
Now wait just a minute
:)
You can't casually mention "IronRails changes look good" on the list without
any indication of what IronRails is. That sounds far too exciting to pass
up. Can someone explain what this might be to us non MSofties?
-Eric
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Curt Hagenl
Ruby and IronRails changes are good.
The call to Handler.HandleFile could go outside of the Rails lock as there's no
Ruby code invoked.
-Original Message-
From: Tomas Matousek
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2008 10:46 AM
To: IronRuby External Code Reviewers; DLR Code Reviews
Cc: ironruby-core@
tfpt review "/shelveset:IronRails2;REDMOND\tomat"
Contains a simple change in DLR.
Ruby changes:
Improves IronRails - switches to IIS7 integrated mode, adds a log, implements
static file handling.
Updates Ruby HAPI.
Fixes writing to text streams (\n should be replaced by \r\n).
Ruby cons
11 matches
Mail list logo
