Re: [Ironruby-core] External libraries implementation status update

2008-03-17 Thread Curt Hagenlocher
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 11:32 PM, Wayne Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I was under the impression that I had finished this, but I'm >> thousands of miles away from being able to check. Have you >> tried to use StringScanner? > > I didn't realize that this external module was already impleme

Re: [Ironruby-core] External libraries implementation status update

2008-03-17 Thread Wayne Kelly
> From: Curt Hagenlocher > Sent: Tuesday, 11 March 2008 8:13 PM > Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] External libraries implementation status update > > On 3/6/08, Wayne Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > strscan.so: > > - any progress Curt? > > I

Re: [Ironruby-core] External libraries implementation status update

2008-03-15 Thread Michael Letterle
Just an FYI, I made the first offical release, Zliby (http://rubyforge.org/projects/zliby/), it does Gzip decompression as well as Zlib decompression, and implements all the methods that Dr. Kelly listed. Note though it does rely on a few methods not yet implemented, notably Time.at and block_give

Re: [Ironruby-core] External libraries implementation status update

2008-03-11 Thread Michael Letterle
I've got the rubyforge project up for the pure ruby zlib implementation, SVN has what I got so far, which is basically just Zlib::Inflate, http://rubyforge.org/projects/zliby/ it's rough, but I'm adding to it. On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 5:46 PM, Michael Letterle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like

Re: [Ironruby-core] External libraries implementation status update

2008-03-11 Thread Curt Hagenlocher
On 3/6/08, Wayne Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > strscan.so: > - any progress Curt? I was under the impression that I had finished this, but I'm thousands of miles away from being able to check. Have you tried to use StringScanner? -- Curt Hagenlocher [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Ironruby-core] External libraries implementation status update

2008-03-07 Thread Michael Letterle
I'd like to implement zlib in pure ruby, but in the mean time, I think this should be good enough. Time will tell. Once we get a good collection of these libraries together we'll be able to see what's really needed ;) Anyway, updated zlib.rb attached, it performs the Gzip and Zlib decompression..

Re: [Ironruby-core] External libraries implementation status update

2008-03-06 Thread John Messerly
Michael Letterle: > Alright, I started doing this tonight (finally) GZip was pretty > straight forward, but Inflate may be a problem, The > System::IO::Compression.DeflateStream is RFC 1951 compliant /not/ > 1950.. Meaning it only covers Deflate, not ZLib in general. See here: > https://connect.

Re: [Ironruby-core] External libraries implementation status update

2008-03-06 Thread Michael Letterle
Alright, I started doing this tonight (finally) GZip was pretty straight forward, but Inflate may be a problem, The System::IO::Compression.DeflateStream is RFC 1951 compliant /not/ 1950.. Meaning it only covers Deflate, not ZLib in general. See here: https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/fe

Re: [Ironruby-core] External libraries implementation status update

2008-03-06 Thread Eduardo A. Flores Verduzco
On stringio: I'm finishing some compatibility tests with ruby 1.8.6. Hope send the patch soon for revision. Regards On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 12:29 AM, Wayne Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A while back I posted a list of external libraries that we needed to > implement in order to support gems

Re: [Ironruby-core] External libraries implementation status update

2008-03-06 Thread Mike Moore
I believe the consensus from September was to follow JRuby's lead and base the implementation on System.IO.Compression as much as possible, and code anything that was needed to get it compatible with the Ruby library. http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ironruby-core/2007-September/24.html On Thu,

Re: [Ironruby-core] External libraries implementation status update

2008-03-06 Thread Eric Nicholson
This came up on the list a few months ago. The consensus was that building off of System.IO.Compression would be the best, and failing that wrapping Zlib.Net should be possible. You can dig up the old thread for some more details though. -Eric On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Ivan Porto Carrero

Re: [Ironruby-core] External libraries implementation status update

2008-03-06 Thread Ivan Porto Carrero
Hi Is there any objection against using a wrapper around zlib.net ? On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 2:27 AM, Michael Letterle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 1:29 AM, Wayne Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > A while back I posted a list of external libraries that we need

Re: [Ironruby-core] External libraries implementation status update

2008-03-06 Thread Michael Letterle
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 1:29 AM, Wayne Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > A while back I posted a list of external libraries that we needed to > implement in order to support gems and Rails. The following summarizes the > libraries that I've been working on. Could others who are also working o

[Ironruby-core] External libraries implementation status update

2008-03-05 Thread Wayne Kelly
A while back I posted a list of external libraries that we needed to implement in order to support gems and Rails. The following summarizes the libraries that I've been working on. Could others who are also working on these libraries please post a status update? Win32API.so: - we just need to