riginal Message-
From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org
[mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Zac Brown
Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 1:46 PM
To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] RubyGems/RDoc 1.8.6 policy
To be honest, no. I went straight from 1.8.6
yforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] RubyGems/RDoc 1.8.6 policy
Yup, thats what it appears. I'm willing to work on either, just depends on what
people's needs are. I personally would be prefer just pushing forward with 1.9
support but I don't know the state of 1.9 vs 1.8.7 suppor
-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Zac Brown
Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 1:28 PM
To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] RubyGems/RDoc 1.8.6 policy
Yup, thats what it appears. I'm willing to work on either, just depends on what
people's needs are. I personally would be pref
Yup, thats what it appears. I'm willing to work on either, just depends
on what people's needs are. I personally would be prefer just pushing
forward with 1.9 support but I don't know the state of 1.9 vs 1.8.7 support.
-Zac
On 4/24/2010 12:57 PM, Will Green wrote:
Looks like we'll need an Iron
Looks like we'll need an IronRuby 1.0.1 that brings us up to 1.8.7. Unless
we can get to 1.9 faster...
--
Will Green
http://hotgazpacho.org/
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 4:36 AM, Zac Brown wrote:
> Saw this earlier today, might be something to think about in the near
> future for IronRuby and compa
Saw this earlier today, might be something to think about in the near
future for IronRuby and compatibility.
http://blog.segment7.net/articles/2010/04/23/ruby-1-8-6-policy
-Zac
___
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforg
