with constructing another build system and trying to hack it so
> that it works with .csproj files. Scripts that would create various packages
> are indeed welcome. But please keep them simple and based upon the current
> build system.
>
> Tomas
>
> -Original Message-
> From:
nruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org
[mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Alistair Bush
Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 12:04 AM
To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] Very Very initial CMake support
> Please don't add yet another build system.
&
is a mess at the
> moment. Far to many redundant files left over. Sadly you just sync (copy
> is a more appropriate term) entire directories between projects repos so
> now even if I fix it within the ironruby tree I have to worry about them
> coming back in the next sync.
>
> > Tomas
ithin the ironruby tree I have to worry about them coming back in the
next sync.
>
> Tomas
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org
> [mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Alistair Bush
> Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2
-boun...@rubyforge.org
[mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Andrius Bentkus
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 5:16 PM
To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] Very Very initial CMake support
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 7:56 PM, Tomas Matousek
-
> From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org [mailto:
> ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Alistair Bush
> Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 11:18 AM
> To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] Very Very initial CMake support
>
> > Having
as
-Original Message-
From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org
[mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Alistair Bush
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 11:18 AM
To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] Very Very initial CMake support
&g
> Having multiple building systems is counterproductive, it's hard to
> maintain all of them.
>
In General I agree. thats is why ultimately I would like cmake to support
creating of csproj files. That would need to be implemented, but has already
been proven possible by cmakes other VS proj
Having multiple building systems is counterproductive, it's hard to maintain
all of them.
Is cmake using xbuild to buil the dlls or does it all the file linking by
itself?
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Alistair Bush wrote:
> I have started playing around with cmake to see whether it could he
I have started playing around with cmake to see whether it could help out
iron* and dlr. I have therefore started implementing CMake makefiles to build
the dlr (Runtime) part of ironruby, install those dlls into the gac and
generate *.pc files for them. I have tested it on mono-2.8 (requires m
10 matches
Mail list logo
