I was really looking forward to meet you guys here at Texas, well next time.
Matz is giving the key note.
Thanks.
Unni
--- On Thu, 7/17/08, John Lam (IRONRUBY) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: John Lam (IRONRUBY) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: [Ironruby-core] Code Review: unni1
> To: "[EMA
As much as we would love to attend more Ruby conferences (and there are a LOT
of Ruby conferences!), we really don't have the bandwidth. So we're being very
careful about where we go.
We'll be at RubyConf this year.
Thanks,
-John
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Oh, I know what this is. Could you verify that the method is internal in the
bits you're using?
The method should be public and it is in the current code.
Tomas
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aaron Clauson
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 1:
Tomas Matousek wrote:
> Oh, I know what this is. Could you verify that the method is internal in
> the bits you're using?
> The method should be public and it is in the current code.
>
> Tomas
Hi Tomas,
Do you mean the CreateScope method, i.e.
IronRuby.CreateRuntime().CreateScope("IronRuby")?
Hi,
Have a look here, for detailed information on IronPython 2.0 Plans
http://devhawk.net/2008/07/17/IronPython+Post+20+Roadmap.aspx
It gives,details about its current status and Road Map Plans for version
2.0
Hope we can get such Road Map Plans for IronRuby 1.0 too.
Thanks
--
Posted via http:
No, I mean: Ruby.Runtime.RubyTopLevelScope.TopMethodMissing.
I'm not sure you can build successfully against Silverlight. There might have
been some changes in Silverlight that required us to change DLR/IronRuby code
since the last public release.
Tomas
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
