Re: [isabelle-dev] [Fwd: [isabelle] Monad_Syntax breaks display of abbreviations]

2013-10-01 Thread Peter Lammich
On Di, 2013-10-01 at 14:12 +0900, Christian Sternagel wrote: > Thanks Jasmin! > > @Peter: Does this patch work with your developments as expected? > At first glance, everything looks fine! Thank you for fixing this. -- Peter p.s. I've commited the patch, it's e13b0c88c798

[isabelle-dev] isabelle jedit -l HOL fails

2013-10-01 Thread Clemens Ballarin
After updating the repository today (and a seemingly good run of 'isabelle components -a') 'isabelle jedit -l HOL' gives me 2013-10-01 20:42:22.345 java[35294:903] *** NSInvocation: warning: object 0x10ad24390 of class 'ThreadUtilities' does not implement methodSignatureForSelector: -- trou

Re: [isabelle-dev] isabelle jedit -l HOL fails

2013-10-01 Thread Lars Noschinski
Try running "jedit -bf", if that does not help, manually remove the build artifacts (I.e. the jar files). Sometimes rebuilding of the Java components doors not work reliably. Clemens Ballarin schrieb: >After updating the repository today (and a seemingly good run of >'isabelle components -a'

Re: [isabelle-dev] isabelle jedit -l HOL fails

2013-10-01 Thread Clemens Ballarin
Quoting Lars Noschinski : Try running "jedit -bf", if that does not help, manually remove the build artifacts (I.e. the jar files). Sometimes rebuilding of the Java components doors not work reliably. Thanks! 'jedit -bf -l HOL' worked. Clemens _

Re: [isabelle-dev] NEWS: elimination rules for recursive functions and new command fun_cases

2013-10-01 Thread Alexander Krauss
On 09/30/2013 02:41 PM, Makarius wrote: On Mon, 30 Sep 2013, Manuel Eberl wrote: On 30/09/13 11:49, Makarius wrote: On Mon, 23 Sep 2013, Manuel Eberl wrote: I sent my changes to Alexander Krauss last Wednesday so that he can review them. We are now getting very close to the fork-point for

Re: [isabelle-dev] Testboard

2013-10-01 Thread Alexander Krauss
On 09/27/2013 11:49 AM, Lars Noschinski wrote: It might be a good idea to implement a strategy which tests the existing heads in reverse chronological order (commits pushed last get tested first), but I am not sure whether this information is available in Mercurial (we have the commit date, but t

Re: [isabelle-dev] Testboard

2013-10-01 Thread Lars Noschinski
On 02.10.2013 01:09, Alexander Krauss wrote: On 09/27/2013 11:49 AM, Lars Noschinski wrote: It might be a good idea to implement a strategy which tests the existing heads in reverse chronological order (commits pushed last get tested first), but I am not sure whether this information is availabl