Re: [isabelle-dev] NEWS: avoid the Complex constructor, use the more natural Re/Im view

2014-05-10 Thread Manuel Eberl
Hallo, I stumbled across this just now and thought about it for a bit. I don't know much about category theory, but I would say the intuitive “reason” why complex numbers can be represented this way is the following: 1. ℂ is a field extension of ℝ with degree 2 (since it is constructed from the ℝ

Re: [isabelle-dev] NEWS: avoid the Complex constructor, use the more natural Re/Im view

2014-05-07 Thread Makarius
On Wed, 7 May 2014, Johannes Hölzl wrote: * Theorems about complex numbers are now stated only using Re and Im, the Complex constructor is not used anymore. It is possible to use primcorec to defined the behaviour of a complex-valued function. This is also a surprising application of primcor

[isabelle-dev] NEWS: avoid the Complex constructor, use the more natural Re/Im view

2014-05-07 Thread Johannes Hölzl
* Theorems about complex numbers are now stated only using Re and Im, the Complex constructor is not used anymore. It is possible to use primcorec to defined the behaviour of a complex-valued function. Removed theorems about the Complex constructor from the simpset, they are available as