Re: [isabelle-dev] inductive_set vs. 'a set

2012-01-09 Thread Stefan Berghofer
Quoting Lawrence Paulson : I got this message several times when converting theories. There is a workaround, but nevertheless, I think this is a bug. Hi Larry, the reason for this problem is the removal of the rules pred_equals_eq and pred_subset_eq from the rule database used for the predica

Re: [isabelle-dev] inductive_set vs. 'a set

2012-01-09 Thread Lawrence Paulson
I got this message several times when converting theories. There is a workaround, but nevertheless, I think this is a bug. Larry On 9 Jan 2012, at 13:31, Makarius wrote: > There is another drop-out concerning 'a set (in Isabelle/05a82dd869ed): > > inductive_set > well_formed_gterm' :: "('f \ n

[isabelle-dev] inductive_set vs. 'a set

2012-01-09 Thread Makarius
There is another drop-out concerning 'a set (in Isabelle/05a82dd869ed): inductive_set well_formed_gterm' :: "('f \ nat) \ 'f gterm set" for arity :: "'f \ nat" where step[intro!]: "\args \ lists (well_formed_gterm' arity); length args = arity f\ \ (Apply f args)