Message from London Guantanamo Campaign email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] friendWe would 
appreciate if you could write a letter to your MP opposing the government 
seeking draconian police powers such as the extension of pre-charge detention 
from 28 to 56 days. You can find all the arguments against these measures and 
resources including a draft letter on our website www.campacc.org.uk Please 
forward this email to your contacts. However if you want to send a quick letter 
by email, you can do it in less than 5 minutes by following these steps1. 
Please click this link http://www.writetothem.com/2. A separate window will 
appear. Put in your post code and you will get a link to your MP. 3. Click that 
it will take to a form. entering your details and space for the letter4. Then 
copy this letter below and paste it in the space for the letter in the form. 
Edit it.5. Send6. Go back to your email. You will get a message to confirm that 
you want to send the message. Click the link. Draft letter




Dear Local MP dude/dudette (search www.writetothem.com), Re: Counter Terrorism 
Bill 2007 proposals I am writing to you as your constituent to express my 
concerns about the government’s proposals for the Counter-Terrorism Bill 2007. 
These proposals seek to extend the injustice of current police powers, which 
are extensive already.These proposals are based on the Terrorism Act 2000, 
which has defined terrorism so broadly as to criminalise many normal political 
activities in this country and resistance to oppressive regimes abroad. That 
Act created the ‘terrorist’ offences of belonging to certain organisations, 
sharing a platform with their members, and helping them financially, for 
example by selling publications. In particular I oppose the following new 
powers, which would be inherently unjust: 1. Detention without charge would be 
extended from 28 days to 56 days or possibly even 90 days. For anyone deemed a 
‘terror suspect’, the current limit of 28 days already represents a drastic 
extension from that before the Terrorism Act 2000. There are no credible 
grounds for why such a long time would be necessary. It is equivalent to 8 
weeks of a custodial sentence. The 28-day detention period has been used as a 
substitute for a proper criminal investigation, instead intimidating and 
stigmatising people as ‘terror suspects’. Extending pre-charge detention would 
be equivalent to 4 months of custodial sentence having serious impact on an 
individuals job prospects and family life. The majority of the people arrested 
under anti-terror laws are innocent and they need to be protected. Such a long 
detention amounts to internment in all but name, thus violating the principle 
of habeas corpus. It ignores the principle that citizens must be considered 
innocent until proven guilty. Police naturally want as much time as possible to 
lean on a suspect before honouring this principle. They may also lobby 
government to give them such powers, but in a free society, the police enforce 
the law, they don't make it. 2. Post-charge questioning of ‘terror 
suspects’Likewise such powers can be used to intimidate detainees, as a 
substitute for an adequate basis for the criminal charge in the first place. 
There needs to appropriate judicial oversight to ensure that this is supervised 
rigorously to prevent intimidation and pro-longed interrogation.3. A new 
criminal offence of seeking ‘information which could be useful for terrorism’. 
This offence would apply regardless of whether or not the seeker intends a 
‘terrorist’ use – again terrorism being defined in such a broad way as to 
encompass many non-violent activities and to criminalise the peace movement, 
some strikers, or anyone planning boycotts, pickets, blockades etc. Information 
‘which could be useful for terrorism’ can mean nearly anything, e.g. having 
maps or researching companies, and would be used for speculative charges to 
harass or criminalise political activists. 4. Travel restrictions for 
‘suspects’For mere suspicion of involvement in terrorism, anyone could face 
travel restrictions and be deprived of their passport. Protesters could be 
prevented from travelling to international demonstrations. Like control orders, 
this would be punishment without trial. 5. Collective punishment of families of 
convicted terroristsUnder control orders, the imposing of curfews, electronic 
tagging, restrictions on the use of telephones (and mobile phones and the 
Internet) and restrictions on visits by relatives and friends, even of 
children, have turned homes into prisons for the family as a whole. The 
proposal to make it easier for the court to order the forfeiture of complex 
assets, such as a house and a flat of a convicted terrorist would punish the 
family. Given the recent convictions for possessing DVDs however radical under 
the provisions of the ‘glorification of terrorism’, this move is extremely 
serious. The counter terrorism powers that exist and the new ones the 
government is seeking are best judged by the potential effect they have on 
every citizen. Government has a responsibility to protect society from 
terrorist attacks; however, Parliament has a responsibility to protect citizens 
from excessive powers wielded by the state.For all the reasons stated above, I 
ask that you give an undertaking not to vote for the renewal or extension of 
any ‘anti-terror’ powers. I would be grateful if you let me know your views on 
the new proposals and where you stand in relation to specific proposals as soon 
as possible as time is of the essence. I shall be contacting your constituency 
office for an appointment to discuss these issues with you in person. I look 
forward to hearing from you.Yours sincerely, Your name insha'Allaah

Some London MPs below:Hackney, Stoke Newington: Diana Abbott - [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] (PA)Ealing: Virendra Sharma - [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sadiq Khan - [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] Ham: Stephen Timms - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Brent: Sarah Teather - [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] Green, Bow: George Galloway - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__________________









_________________________________________________________________
100’s of Music vouchers to be won with MSN Music
https://www.musicmashup.co.uk

Reply via email to