Concept of justice

  By Sidrah Unis
  MOST of the recent western legal concepts such as supremacy of law, equality 
before law, judicial independence and impartiality, juristic personality, 
non-retroactivity, legal representation, presumption of innocence, etc., were 
never alien to Islam.

Muslims can take just pride in the fact that from the beginning their judicial 
system was placed on lines that in substance are no different from those of the 
best systems of today. Let us take a brief look at some of the main features of 
administration of justice in Islam.

1. Supremacy of law: In Islamic legal system, no ruler and no official can 
claim to be above the law. No acts, procedures, and decisions of any authority, 
howsoever high it may be, can be valid and binding as to the people they 
affect, save to the extent they are in consonance with the law.

2. Equality before law: The Quran and the Sunnah, which are the primary sources 
of Islamic law, put great emphasis on equality. Consequently, in Islamic legal 
system there cannot be one law for the ruler and another for the subject; one 
for the powerful and another for the weak; one for the rich and another for the 
poor. Government authorities enjoy no special privileges or immunities from the 
application of law. Even the Holy Prophet (PBUH) did not consider himself or 
his family above the law. Instead of claiming any immunity from the law, he 
laid down the rule that even the head of the state may be challenged, in both 
official and private capacity, in the court.

The following statement of the Prophet, which he made while deciding the case 
of a noble woman who had committed theft, demonstrates it all: “Verily those 
who were before you were destroyed because when a noble man from among them 
committed theft, they passed no sentence on him. By Allah, had Fatima, the 
daughter of Muhammad, committed theft, I would have cut off her hand.”

Also, during the course of his last sermon, the Prophet publicly offered to the 
community that if he owed anything to anyone, or had done any harm to anyone’s 
life or property, he was available to answer for it. One person came forward 
and demanded some money which was immediately paid.

3. Judicial impartiality: The Quran says: “Surely We have revealed the Book to 
thee with truth that thou may judge between people by means of what Allah has 
taught thee. And be not one pleading the cause of the dishonest.” (4: 105)

It is agreed that the occasion of the revelation of the above-given verse was a 
dispute between a Jew and a Muslim, in which the Prophet decided against the 
Muslim. The Muslim, supported by his tribe, had falsely accused the Jew of 
theft. At a time when help was sorely needed for the defence of Islam, a 
verdict against a man supported by his tribe meant the loss of that tribe. But 
such considerations did not carry any weight with the Prophet and he cleared 
the Jew of the charge. Thus, the verse lays down that dishonesty must be 
punished, and the balance of justice must be held equal between friends and 
foes and between Muslims and non-Muslims.

The Prophet was known for his fair and impartial administration of justice. 
Along with Muslims, non-Muslims would also come to him for settlement of their 
disputes and he would adjudicate in accordance with their laws. He strictly 
observed the Quranic instructions regarding equality before law, and never made 
any distinction between litigants on the basis of religion or relations.

The Quran says: “O you, who believe, be maintainers of justice, bearers of 
witness for Allah, even though it be against your own selves or (your) parents 
or near relatives—- whether he be rich or poor .... And if you distort or turn 
away (from truth), surely Allah is ever Aware of what you do.” (4: 135) “O you 
who believe, be upright for Allah, bearers of witness with justice; and not let 
hatred of a people incite you not to act equitably. Be just; that is nearer to 
observance of duty. And keep your duty to Allah. Surely Allah is aware of what 
you do.” (5: 8)

The extent to which impartiality is expected of a judge is also well 
illustrated in the story concerning Caliph Umar. He once had a lawsuit against 
a Jew. When both parties went before the judge, the latter rose in his seat out 
of deference to Umar. Umar looked upon this act of deference to one party as an 
unpardonable judicial weakness and dismissed the judge at once.

4. Judicial independence: In Islamic legal system, judiciary is independent of 
executive control. Judges can perform their functions without any interference 
and none can influence the course of justice with his authority or wealth. The 
following portion of a letter that was written by Caliph Ali to one of his 
governors, excellently explains the notion of independence of judiciary in 
Islam:

“Select for your Chief Judge one from the people who by far is the best among 
them; one who is not obsessed with domestic worries; one who cannot be 
intimidated; one who does not err too often; one who does not turn back from 
the right path once he finds it; one who is not self centred or avaricious; one 
who will not decide before knowing full facts; one who will weigh with care 
every attendant doubt and pronounce a clear verdict after taking everything 
into full consideration; one who will not grow restive over the arguments of 
advocates; one who will examine with patience every new disclosure of facts; 
one who will be strictly impartial in his decision; one whom flattery cannot 
mislead; one who does not exult over his position. But it is not easy to find 
such men...

Once you have selected the right man for the office, pay him handsomely enough 
to let him live in comfort and in keeping with his position, enough to keep him 
above temptations. Give him a position in your court so high that none can even 
dream of coveting it, and so high that neither backbiting nor intrigue can 
touch him.”

Since law, in Islam, stands at the apex of social organisation, those who 
administer the law must likewise be elevated and kept free of all executive 
control.

5. Free administration of justice: In Islamic legal system, justice is 
administered free of cost. All citizens, regardless of their financial status, 
can get justice without incurring any expenses in the form of court fee, stamp 
duty, etc.

Conclusion: In Islam, the concept of justice is more comprehensive, vital, and 
sacred than in any other system. It is one of the fundamental objectives of the 
Islamic state to provide justice. Not only justice is considered to be a trust, 
a sacred responsibility, which is to be performed in conformity with the 
provisions of the Quran and the Sunnah; but the dispensation of justice also 
constitutes one of the most important acts of devotion.



ABDUL WAHID OSMAN BELAL
 
---------------------------------
Have a burning question? Go to Yahoo! Answers and get answers from real people 
who know.

Reply via email to