Why is Rahul Gandhi a target for Hindutva, Zionist groups?  

  By Jawed Naqvi  
THERE was this bald news item last week, carefully bereft of the context. “The 
owner of a Hindutva website has been sent a legal notice by Congress MP Rahul 
Gandhi for publishing slanderous literature about him,” it said. The website 
run by non-resident Indian Rohit Vyasmaan — hinduUnity.org — had been banned by 
ISPs in India following a Mumbai police request in April 2004, for propagating 
anti-Muslim articles.

After the original posting on Rahul Gandhi on the website had been copied by 
other websites, Rahul Gandhi decided to trace where the original write-up had 
come from. A notice has been sent via email and to a post box number belonging 
to Vyasmaan in the United States.

Senior lawyer Abhishek Manu Singhvi’s legal notice said: “This publication 
exceeds and excels even the worst standards of scurrilous, perverted gutter 
writing — acting at the behest of maliciously motivated elements who cannot 
stand Rahul Gandhi’s standing and popularity in India and abroad. We intend to 
prosecute you and conspirators under all relevant civil and criminal laws.”

The above article in the Indian Express seems to highlight the implied virtue 
of criminal litigation as a means to confront Hindutva, which incidentally 
happens to be a major rightwing political movement that threatens to swamp 
India in a very short time if it is not checked right away. In fact, as some 
would say, it may already be too late.

What the Express report did not highlight was the fact that the offending 
website owner was a leading pointman in New York for a flourishing alliance 
between two rabid groups based in the United

States – rightwing Zionists, as opposed to the mainstream liberal

Jews, and rightwing Hindutva campaigners, as opposed to the immensely liberal 
Hindu diaspora. In other words the people who targeted Rahul Gandhi are the 
same as those that were seeking a myopic Israeli-US-India partnership during 
the Vajpayee administration.

A report by The New York Times journalist Dean E. Murphy on June 2, 2001, 
barely a month before the India-Pakistan Agra summit, gave a detailed account 
of how the Hindutva-Zionist nexus worked. The report referred to Vyasmaan’s 
group as militant Hindus based in Queens and

Long Island quarters of New York. A picture on another website showed Vyasmaan 
in an orange attire of the Bajrang Dal with other members of the group holding 
aloft their banner.

Murphy’s report reveals how Vyasmaan’s website was once shut down in 2001 
following complaints that it advocated hatred and violence towards Muslims. But 
a few days later, the site was back on the Internet. “The unlikely rescuers 
were some radical Jews in Brooklyn who are under investigation for possible 
ties to anti-Arab terrorist organisations in Israel.” Excerpts from Murphy’s 
report could be useful in assessing the political challenges that lie ahead for 
Rahul Gandhi and others, challenges that cannot be tackled by any amount of 
litigation against this or that Hindtuva group settled abroad.

“The unusual alliance brings together two extreme religious philosophies from 
different parts of the world that, at first glance, have little in common,” 
observes Murphy.

“But living elbow-to-elbow in the ethnic mix of New York, the small groups of 
Hindus and Jews have discovered that sharing a distant enemy is sufficient 
basis for friendship.

“So tight is their anti-Muslim bond that some of the Hindus marched alongside 
the Jews in the annual Salute to Israel Parade on Fifth Avenue last month. 
Yesterday, several of the Jews joined a protest outside the United Nations 
against the treatment of Hindus in Afghanistan by the Taliban regime,” said the 
report on June 2, 2001.

“We are fighting the same war,” Murphy quotes Rohit Vyasmaan as saying. 
Vyasmaan helps run the Hindu website, HinduUnity.org, from his home in 
Flushing, Queens. “Whether you call them Palestinians, Afghans or Pakistanis, 
the root of the problem for Hindus and Jews is Islam,” says Vyasmaan. How he 
turned Rahul Gandhi’s tormentor is another story.

The budding Hindu-Jewish relationship presents a view that counters a popular 
perception of New York City — not as an open door to immigrants seeking a 
better life, but as a political way station, where some people come or stay not 
to make money but to engage in politics from afar.

For some of the Jews in Brooklyn and the Hindus in Queens and Long

Island, their time in the United States is temporary, made necessary only 
because of the threat of Islam in South Asia and the Middle East.

Ultimately, members of both groups told Murphy, they must leave New York to 
confront the enemy face-to-face.

“I would love to move back to India provided the situation improves there,” Mr 
Vyasmaan said. “We have made a promise to do so.”

Mr Vyasmaan, who is 36 and came to New York from New Delhi when he was 13, said 
matter-of-factly that he and many others expect to die in the battle for Hindu 
supremacy. Nonetheless, he is protective of the identities of some of 
HinduUnity.org’s biggest financial backers.

Some of them have been implicated in Hindu nationalist acts in India and are 
only in the United States biding their time, he said. One of the site’s major 
supporters on Long Island was involved in destroying an ancient mosque at 
Ayodhya in northern India in 1992, Mr Vyasmaan said.

“HinduUnity.org advertises itself as the official site of Bajrang Dal, a 
fundamentalist Hindu movement in India that has chapters throughout that 
country and has frequently clashed with Muslims and was among the groups blamed 
for the 1992 attack. The website also goes by the name Soldiers of Hindutva, a 
term that refers to the primacy of Hindu religion and culture. Mr Vyasmaan said 
the website has 500 people affiliated with it.

The Jews in Brooklyn, meanwhile, are followers of Rabbi Meir David Kahane, the 
assassinated Israeli politician whose teachings advocated the expulsion from 
Israel of all Arabs, most of whom are Muslim.

“Their headquarters in Brooklyn was raided in January (2001) by the F.B.I. as 
part of a federal investigation into their association with two Kahane 
political parties that were banned in Israel and designated as terrorist 
organisations by the State Department.

“The Brooklyn group runs a website, Kahane.org, that aims to keep the Kahane 
movement alive despite the political crackdown in Israel and the terrorist 
designations in the United States. The site’s manager,

Michael Guzofsky, said the Jewish-Hindu relationship in New York is a practical 
one that reflects a common suffering at the hands of the differences in their 
religious traditions, which, he acknowledged, the two groups have never 
addressed in detail.

“I definitely understand their pain even if I don’t know much about their 
faith,” Mr Guzofsky said of the Hindu fundamentalists. “Their website is a 
little more militant than ours, but an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth kind 
of speech is something you can find in the Old Testament. I am not going to 
judge people who have been oppressed by others and who fight back.”

Murphy’s report, now almost six years old, may yet be an eye opener for people 
like Rahul Gandhi who once said that he could only pity the

Bharatiya Janata Party, the political arm of the group Mr Vyasmaan works for. 
“They are a sad joke,” he had said of the BJP famously after the 2004 elections 
that catapulted his Congress party to power.

That was not a terribly political thing to say. Nor is criminal litigation the 
most appropriate way to fight a movement that has such a canny resemblance to 
what we have come to know as fascism.






ABDUL WAHID OSMAN BELAL
 
---------------------------------
It's here! Your new message!
Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar.

Reply via email to