[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

clebert suconic reassigned ARTEMIS-898:
---------------------------------------

    Assignee: Christopher L. Shannon

> Artemis Plugin Support
> ----------------------
>
>                 Key: ARTEMIS-898
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-898
>             Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Broker
>    Affects Versions: 2.next
>            Reporter: Matt Pavlovich
>            Assignee: Christopher L. Shannon
>             Fix For: 2.next
>
>
> ActiveMQ 5.x currently has a number of extension points via Plugins, or 
> simple Spring bean wiring. Artemis should provide extension points to meet 
> various requirements.
> The protocol interceptors are handy, but also limiting in that each plugin 
> would need to be implemented for every protocol. Feels like there should be 
> defined extension point(s) within the broker.
> Core Broker Plugins:
> 1. Message header / property manipulation
> 2. Message body manipulation
> 3. Activity tracing (broker becomes master, network bridge start/stop, 
> message rcv/sent/ack/rollback, consumer/producer add/remove, broker 
> add/remove, destination add/remove, connection add/remove, fast producer/slow 
> consumer, etc)
>      a. Audit / trace logs
>      b. Triggers based on events
> ref: 
> http://activemq.apache.org/maven/apidocs/org/apache/activemq/broker/MutableBrokerFilter.html
> Additional extension point:
>  DestinationPolicies: Ability to impact destination behaviors for dispatch, 
> subscription policies, etc.
> Side benefit regarding Advisory Support:
> If the plugin framework can get squared away, an upside could be that 
> Advisory support becomes a plugin vs an ingrained feature and we could have 
> more control over configuration and behavior.
> From ARTEMIS-17
> Support for using Camel as an interceptor/plugin



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to