[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16242687#comment-16242687 ]
Li Jin edited comment on ARROW-1710 at 11/7/17 7:18 PM: -------------------------------------------------------- Seems we agree to remove non nullable vectors. The next question is, what do people feel about dropping the "Nullable" prefix in new vector classes? [~bryanc] brought this up initially. I am +1 for dropping the "Nullable" prefix. I think It makes the code more concise. was (Author: icexelloss): Seems we agree to remove non nullable vectors. The next question is, what do people feel about dropping the "Nullable" prefix in new vector classes? [~bryanc] brought this up initially. I am +1 for dropping the "Nullable" prefix. It makes the code more concise. > [Java] Decide what to do with non-nullable vectors in new vector class > hierarchy > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ARROW-1710 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1710 > Project: Apache Arrow > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: Java - Vectors > Reporter: Li Jin > Fix For: 0.8.0 > > > So far the consensus seems to be remove all non-nullable vectors. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029)