[jira] [Created] (CALCITE-4418) Allow Interpreter to read from JDBC input

Julian Hyde created CALCITE-4418: Summary: Allow Interpreter to read from JDBC input Key: CALCITE-4418 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4418 Project: Calcite Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-4417) "Two non-abstract methods ... have the same parameter types"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17237216#comment-17237216 ] Vladimir Sitnikov commented on CALCITE-4417: I guess the way to workaround

[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-4415) SqlStdOperatorTable.NOT_LIKE has a wrong implementor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17237225#comment-17237225 ] Ruben Q L commented on CALCITE-4415: [~julianhyde], ok, you have persuaded me :) I

[jira] [Comment Edited] (CALCITE-4415) SqlStdOperatorTable.NOT_LIKE has a wrong implementor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17237225#comment-17237225 ] Ruben Q L edited comment on CALCITE-4415 at 11/23/20, 8:49 AM: --

[jira] [Assigned] (CALCITE-4418) Allow Interpreter to read from JDBC input

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Julian Hyde reassigned CALCITE-4418: Assignee: Julian Hyde > Allow Interpreter to read from JDBC input >

[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-4418) Allow Interpreter to read from JDBC input

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17237235#comment-17237235 ] Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-4418: -- Allow Interpreter to read from JDBC input.

[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-4410) Expose the type of internal sql node in Planner

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17237241#comment-17237241 ] Stamatis Zampetakis commented on CALCITE-4410: -- I like both ideas outlined

[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-4415) SqlStdOperatorTable.NOT_LIKE has a wrong implementor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17237251#comment-17237251 ] Ruben Q L commented on CALCITE-4415: [~julianhyde], unfortunately, a quick test sho

[jira] [Comment Edited] (CALCITE-4415) SqlStdOperatorTable.NOT_LIKE has a wrong implementor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17237251#comment-17237251 ] Ruben Q L edited comment on CALCITE-4415 at 11/23/20, 9:44 AM: --

[jira] [Assigned] (CALCITE-4419) Posix regex operators cannot be used within RelBuilder

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ruben Q L reassigned CALCITE-4419: -- Assignee: Ruben Q L > Posix regex operators cannot be used within RelBuilder > -

[jira] [Updated] (CALCITE-4419) Posix regex operators cannot be used within RelBuilder

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ruben Q L updated CALCITE-4419: --- Description: Posix regex operators are special, they are defined as binary ({{public class SqlPosi

[jira] [Created] (CALCITE-4419) Posix regex operators cannot be used within RelBuilder

Ruben Q L created CALCITE-4419: -- Summary: Posix regex operators cannot be used within RelBuilder Key: CALCITE-4419 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4419 Project: Calcite Issue

[jira] [Updated] (CALCITE-4419) Posix regex operators cannot be used within RelBuilder

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ruben Q L updated CALCITE-4419: --- Description: Posix regex operators are special, they are defined as binary ({{public class SqlPosi

[jira] [Updated] (CALCITE-4419) Posix regex operators cannot be used within RelBuilder

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ruben Q L updated CALCITE-4419: --- Description: Posix regex operators are special, they are defined as binary ({{public class SqlPosi

[jira] [Updated] (CALCITE-4419) Posix regex operators cannot be used within RelBuilder

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ruben Q L updated CALCITE-4419: --- Description: Posix regex operators are special, they are defined as binary ({{public class SqlPosi

[jira] [Updated] (CALCITE-4419) Posix regex operators cannot be used within RelBuilder

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ruben Q L updated CALCITE-4419: --- Description: Posix regex operators are special, they are defined as binary ({{public class SqlPosi

[jira] [Updated] (CALCITE-4419) Posix regex operators cannot be used within RelBuilder

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ruben Q L updated CALCITE-4419: --- Description: Posix regex operators are special, they are defined as binary ({{public class SqlPosi

[jira] [Updated] (CALCITE-4419) Posix regex operators cannot be used within RelBuilder

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Ruben Q L updated CALCITE-4419: --- Description: Posix regex operators are special, they are defined as binary ({{public class SqlPosi

[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-4410) Expose the type of internal sql node in Planner

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17237607#comment-17237607 ] Will Yu commented on CALCITE-4410: -- [~julianhyde]  ?? I guess we could add a {{SqlVal

[jira] [Comment Edited] (CALCITE-4410) Expose the type of internal sql node in Planner

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17237607#comment-17237607 ] Will Yu edited comment on CALCITE-4410 at 11/23/20, 6:48 PM:

[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-4410) Expose the type of internal sql node in Planner

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17237640#comment-17237640 ] Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-4410: -- {quote}However, {{Planner}} interface does

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (CALCITE-4418) Allow Interpreter to read from JDBC input

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Julian Hyde updated CALCITE-4418: - Comment: was deleted (was: Allow Interpreter to read from JDBC input. When Interpreter reads fr

[jira] [Updated] (CALCITE-4418) Allow Interpreter to read from JDBC input

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Julian Hyde updated CALCITE-4418: - Description: Allow Interpreter to read from JDBC input. When Interpreter reads from a JDBC inpu

[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-4418) Allow Interpreter to read from JDBC input

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4418?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17237644#comment-17237644 ] Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-4418: -- Work in progress:  [julianhyde/4418-interp

[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-4419) Posix regex operators cannot be used within RelBuilder

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17237662#comment-17237662 ] Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-4419: -- I agree with 4. The {{Boolean}} parameter

[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-4415) SqlStdOperatorTable.NOT_LIKE has a wrong implementor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17237680#comment-17237680 ] Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-4415: -- If we follow the principle that the Rex la

[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-4408) Implement Oracle SUBSTR function

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17237715#comment-17237715 ] James Starr commented on CALCITE-4408: -- [~julianhyde] I have added my comments her

[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-4417) "Two non-abstract methods ... have the same parameter types"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17237720#comment-17237720 ] Alexander Staubo commented on CALCITE-4417: --- Ah, I didn't know that Calcite t

[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-4408) Implement Oracle SUBSTR function

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17237737#comment-17237737 ] Julian Hyde commented on CALCITE-4408: -- [~jamesstarr], I've replied to your commen

[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-4417) "Two non-abstract methods ... have the same parameter types"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17237742#comment-17237742 ] Vladimir Sitnikov commented on CALCITE-4417: Just to double-check. Can you

[jira] [Updated] (CALCITE-4417) "Two non-abstract methods ... have the same parameter types"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Alexander Staubo updated CALCITE-4417: -- Attachment: build.out > "Two non-abstract methods ... have the same parameter types"

[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-4417) "Two non-abstract methods ... have the same parameter types"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17237751#comment-17237751 ] Alexander Staubo commented on CALCITE-4417: --- Calcite 1.25.0 does not seem to

[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-4408) Implement Oracle SUBSTR function

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17237769#comment-17237769 ] James Starr commented on CALCITE-4408: -- [~julianhyde] I have flatten the logic to

[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-4417) "Two non-abstract methods ... have the same parameter types"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17237868#comment-17237868 ] Alexander Staubo commented on CALCITE-4417: --- My apologies, I was accidentally

[jira] [Commented] (CALCITE-4417) "Two non-abstract methods ... have the same parameter types"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17237872#comment-17237872 ] Alexander Staubo commented on CALCITE-4417: --- Same result with 1.25.0. As for

[jira] [Comment Edited] (CALCITE-4417) "Two non-abstract methods ... have the same parameter types"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17237751#comment-17237751 ] Alexander Staubo edited comment on CALCITE-4417 at 11/24/20, 5:02 AM: ---