[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5155?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jess Balint closed CALCITE-5155.
--------------------------------
Resolved in release 1.33.0 (2023-02-06)
> Custom time frames
> ------------------
>
> Key: CALCITE-5155
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5155
> Project: Calcite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core
> Reporter: Julian Hyde
> Assignee: Julian Hyde
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Fix For: 1.33.0
>
> Time Spent: 2h 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Allow a type system to define its own time units and how they are rolled up.
> Currently, time units are used in the {{EXTRACT}}, {{FLOOR}}, {{TRUNC}}
> functions, and include {{YEAR}}, {{QUARTER}}, {{MONTH}}, {{HOUR}},
> {{MINUTE}}, {{NANOSECOND}}. For example {{FLOOR(t TO HOUR)}} is valid.
> A type system would be allowed to define extra time units. Once a time unit
> is defined the {{EXTRACT}}, {{FLOOR}} and {{TRUNC}} functions should just
> work.
> The definition of might consist of a base unit and multiplier. So
> {{MINUTE15}} would be based on {{MINUTE}} with a multiplier of 15.
> Various rules know that you can roll up {{FLOOR(t TO DAY)}} to {{FLOOR(t TO
> MONTH)}} but you cannot roll {{FLOOR(t TO WEEK)}} to {{FLOOR(t TO MONTH)}}.
> When you define a new time unit, the type system can deduce that full set of
> time units that it can roll up to, and which can roll up to it.
> Should we support time units that do not evenly divide the next largest time
> unit? For example the number of seconds since the top of the hour modulo 7.
> 60 and 3,600 are not a multiples of 7, so {{SecondOfHourMod7}} would be
> different from {{SecondOfMinuteMod7}}.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
