[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-9355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15055642#comment-15055642
]
Claus Ibsen commented on CAMEL-9355:
Thanks for the work.
> Current Throttler implementation is not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-9355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15050222#comment-15050222
]
Claus Ibsen commented on CAMEL-9355:
Please dont change the behavior of the child behavior of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-9355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15030369#comment-15030369
]
Aaron Whiteside commented on CAMEL-9355:
Actually I think you're right, there is a better way,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-9355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15029142#comment-15029142
]
Aaron Whiteside commented on CAMEL-9355:
You are right, there is an extra thread per throttler to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-9355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15029166#comment-15029166
]
Aaron Whiteside commented on CAMEL-9355:
The problem we are seeing with the current throttler, is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-9355?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15028321#comment-15028321
]
Claus Ibsen commented on CAMEL-9355:
I dont think the code is easier, before it was reusing existing
