[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3783?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Michael updated CLOUDSTACK-3783:
--------------------------------
    Comment: was deleted

(was: Was this fixed?  I have the issue in 4.5 and even when trying 4.9)

> VPC VR not functioning with Openvswitch
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CLOUDSTACK-3783
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3783
>             Project: CloudStack
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
> default.) 
>          Components: KVM, Network Devices, SystemVM
>    Affects Versions: 4.1.0, 4.2.0
>         Environment: Host: ubuntu 13.04 x86_64 (up-to-date). openvswitch: 
> 1.9.0. qemu-kvm 1.4.0. libvirt 1.0.2. 
> Cloudstack configured with advanced networking. Tags for physical networks
> - vswitch0 for public & guest traffic
> - vif9 for storage traffic
> - vif8 for management traffic
> Openvswitch configuration: 
> # ovs-vsctl show
>    Bridge "vswitch1"
>        Port "vswitch1"
>            Interface "vswitch1"
>                type: internal
>        Port "eth1"
>            Interface "eth1"
>        Port "vif9"
>            tag: 9
>            Interface "vif9"
>                type: internal
>    Bridge "vswitch0"
>        Port "vnet1"
>            tag: 32
>            Interface "vnet1"
>        Port "vswitch0"
>            Interface "vswitch0"
>                type: internal
>        Port "vif8"
>            tag: 8
>            Interface "vif8"
>                type: internal
>        Port "eth0"
>            Interface "eth0"
>    Bridge "cloud0"
>        Port "vnet0"
>            Interface "vnet0"
>        Port "cloud0"
>            Interface "cloud0"
>                type: internal
>    ovs_version: "1.9.0"
> /etc/cloudstack/agent/agent.properties: 
> #Storage
> #Tue Jul 23 16:57:16 MDT 2013
> guest.network.device=vswitch0
> workers=5
> private.network.device=vif8
> network.bridge.type=openvswitch
> port=8250
> resource=com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource
> pod=1
> libvirt.vif.driver=com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.OvsVifDriver
> zone=1
> guid=98a9c232-b852-38bb-aec6-9617750429f5
> public.network.device=vswitch0
> cluster=1
> local.storage.uuid=d755f2e8-53ed-40f6-b7bb-923bf3693f09
> domr.scripts.dir=scripts/network/domr/kvm
> LibvirtComputingResource.id=1
>            Reporter: Dinu Vlad
>
> When trying to add a VPC, the VR's public interface IP address is not 
> assigned correctly, nor the source nat or the default route. Cloudstack 
> reports the VPC is created successfully, however the VR is left in an 
> "incomplete" state. 
> Relevant agent.log extract: 
> 2013-07-19 16:39:20,961 DEBUG [cloud.agent.Agent] 
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) Processing command: 
> com.cloud.agent.api.PlugNicCommand
> 2013-07-19 16:39:20,970 DEBUG [kvm.resource.OvsVifDriver] 
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) plugging nic=[Nic:Public-192.168.1.68-vlan://32]
> 2013-07-19 16:39:20,970 DEBUG [kvm.resource.OvsVifDriver] 
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) creating a vlan dev and bridge for public 
> traffic per traffic label vswitch0
> 2013-07-19 16:39:21,116 DEBUG [cloud.agent.Agent] 
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) Processing command: 
> com.cloud.agent.api.routing.IpAssocVpcCommand
> 2013-07-19 16:39:21,126 DEBUG 
> [resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResource] 
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) Executing: 
> /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/network/domr/router_proxy.sh 
> vpc_ipassoc.sh 169.254.2.23  -A  -l 192.168.1.68 -c ethnull -g 192.168.1.1 -m 
> 24 -n 192.168.1.0
> 2013-07-19 16:39:29,107 DEBUG [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource] 
> (UgentTask-5:null) Executing: 
> /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/vm/network/security_group.py 
> get_rule_logs_for_vms
> 2013-07-19 16:39:29,233 DEBUG [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource] 
> (UgentTask-5:null) Execution is successful.
> 2013-07-19 16:39:29,235 DEBUG [cloud.agent.Agent] (UgentTask-5:null) Sending 
> ping: Seq 7-103:  { Cmd , MgmtId: -1, via: 7, Ver: v1, Flags: 11, 
> [{"PingRoutingWithNwGroupsCommand":{"newGroupStates":{},"newStates":{},"_gatewayAccessible":true,"_vnetAccessible":true,"hostType":"Routing","hostId":7,"wait":0}}]
>  }
> 2013-07-19 16:39:29,243 DEBUG [cloud.agent.Agent] (Agent-Handler-5:null) 
> Received response: Seq 7-103:  { Ans: , MgmtId: 112938636298, via: 7, Ver: 
> v1, Flags: 100010, 
> [{"PingAnswer":{"_command":{"hostType":"Routing","hostId":7,"wait":0},"result":true,"wait":0}}]
>  }
> 2013-07-19 16:39:38,707 DEBUG 
> [resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResource] 
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) Execution is successful.
> 2013-07-19 16:39:38,708 DEBUG 
> [resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResource] 
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) Device "ethnull" does not exist.
> Cannot find device "ethnull"
> Error: argument "Table_ethnull" is wrong: "table" value is invalid
> Error: argument "Table_ethnull" is wrong: "table" value is invalid
> RTNETLINK answers: No such process
> 2013-07-19 16:39:38,709 DEBUG [cloud.agent.Agent] 
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) Processing command: 
> com.cloud.agent.api.routing.SetSourceNatCommand
> 2013-07-19 16:39:38,719 DEBUG [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource] 
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) failing to get physical interface from 
> bridgecloud0, did not find an eth*, bond*, or vlan* in 
> /sys/devices/virtual/net/cloud0/brif
> 2013-07-19 16:39:38,719 DEBUG [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource] 
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) failed to get vlan id from bridge 
> cloud0attached to physical interface
> 2013-07-19 16:39:38,719 DEBUG [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource] 
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) failing to get physical interface from 
> bridgevswitch0, did not find an eth*, bond*, or vlan* in 
> /sys/devices/virtual/net/vswitch0/brif
> 2013-07-19 16:39:38,719 DEBUG [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource] 
> (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) failed to get vlan id from bridge 
> vswitch0attached to physical interface



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to