[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3664?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Nitin Mehta resolved CLOUDSTACK-3664.
-------------------------------------

    Resolution: Fixed

> scaling up vms is not considering  parameter 
> "cluster.(memory/cpu).allocated.capacity.disablethreshold"
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CLOUDSTACK-3664
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3664
>             Project: CloudStack
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
> default.) 
>          Components: Management Server
>         Environment: xen 4.2
>            Reporter: prashant kumar mishra
>            Assignee: Nitin Mehta
>             Fix For: 4.3.0
>
>         Attachments: Logs_DB.rar, screenshot-1.jpg
>
>
> steps to reproduce
> ================
> 1-prepare a CS setup  with xen 6.1
> 2-set "cluster.memory.allocated.capacity.disablethreshold" to some lower 
> value say 0.2
> 3-deploy some vms  until unless deployment fails because of threshold value.
> 4-Try to scale up  vms
> Expected
> --------------
> scaling up should get failed  because  threshold value
> Actual
> ----------
> scaling up is successful 
> DB
> ====
> mysql> select *from cluster_details;
> +----+------------+----------------------------------------------------+-------+
> | id | cluster_id | name                                               | 
> value |
> +----+------------+----------------------------------------------------+-------+
> |  1 |          1 | cpuOvercommitRatio                                 | 1.0  
>  |
> |  2 |          1 | memoryOvercommitRatio                              | 1.0  
>  |
> |  3 |          1 | cluster.memory.allocated.capacity.disablethreshold | 0.2  
>  |
> +----+------------+----------------------------------------------------+-------+



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.4#6159)

Reply via email to