[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6309?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Rayees Namathponnan updated CLOUDSTACK-6309:
--------------------------------------------

    Attachment: agent.rar
                management-server.rar
                management-server.log.2014-03-30.gz

> [Automation] Router deployment failed due to "aggregated command s execution 
> failure"
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CLOUDSTACK-6309
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6309
>             Project: CloudStack
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
> default.) 
>          Components: Network Controller
>    Affects Versions: 4.4.0
>         Environment: KVM 6.3
> Build 4.4 
>            Reporter: Rayees Namathponnan
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 4.4.0
>
>         Attachments: agent.rar, management-server.log.2014-03-30.gz, 
> management-server.rar
>
>
> This issues in observed with automation run, many router deployment failures 
> are observed with error
> 2014-03-31 00:16:52,144 WARN  [o.a.c.e.o.NetworkOrchestrator] 
> (Work-Job-Executor-22:Job-105/Job-106 ctx-1996e983) Failed to re-
> program the network as a part of network 
> Ntwk[38591d1e-5193-451c-beb0-854f44692880|Guest|8] implement due to 
> aggregated command
> s execution failure!
> Steps to reproduce 
> 1) Create an account 
> 2) Deploy new Newwork and VM 
> Result 
> Router deployment failed with below error in MS
> 2014-03-31 00:16:51,661 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] 
> (Work-Job-Executor-22:Job-105/Job-106 ctx-1996e983) Seq 1-6623669151955157207:
> Sending  { Cmd , MgmtId: 29066118877352, via: 1(Rack2Host11.lab.vmops.com), 
> Ver: v1, Flags: 100011, [{"com.cloud.agent.api.rout
> ing.AggregationControlCommand":{"action":"Finish","accessDetails":{"router.guest.ip":"10.1.1.1","router.name":"r-21-QA","router
> .ip":"169.254.3.129"},"wait":0}}] }
> 2014-03-31 00:16:52,144 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] 
> (Work-Job-Executor-22:Job-105/Job-106 ctx-1996e983) Seq 
> 1-6623669151955157207: Received:  { Ans: , MgmtId: 29066118877352, via: 1, 
> Ver: v1, Flags: 10, { Answer } }
> 2014-03-31 00:16:52,144 WARN  [o.a.c.e.o.NetworkOrchestrator] 
> (Work-Job-Executor-22:Job-105/Job-106 ctx-1996e983) Failed to re-program the 
> network as a part of network 
> Ntwk[38591d1e-5193-451c-beb0-854f44692880|Guest|8] implement due to 
> aggregated commands execution failure!
> 2014-03-31 00:16:52,146 DEBUG [c.c.n.NetworkModelImpl] 
> (Work-Job-Executor-22:Job-105/Job-106 ctx-1996e983) Service SecurityGroup is 
> not supported in the network id=217
> 2014-03-31 00:16:52,158 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] 
> (Work-Job-Executor-22:Job-105/Job-106 ctx-1996e983) Seq 
> 1-6623669151955157209: Sending  { Cmd , MgmtId: 29066118877352, via: 
> 1(Rack2Host11.lab.vmops.com), Ver: v1, Flags: 100011, 
> [{"com.cloud.agent.api.routing.AggregationControlCommand":{"action":"Cleanup","accessDetails":{"router.guest.ip":"10.1.1.1","router.name":"r-21-QA","router.ip":"169.254.3.129"},"wait":0}}]
>  }
> 2014-03-31 00:16:52,202 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] (AgentManager-Handler-9:null) 
> Seq 1-6623669151955157209: Processing:  { Ans: , MgmtId: 29066118877352, via: 
> 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, 
> [{"com.cloud.agent.api.Answer":{"result":true,"wait":0}}] }
> 2014-03-31 00:16:52,202 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] 
> (Work-Job-Executor-22:Job-105/Job-106 ctx-1996e983) Seq 
> 1-6623669151955157209: Received:  { Ans: , MgmtId: 29066118877352, via: 1, 
> Ver: v1, Flags: 10, { Answer } }
> 2014-03-31 00:16:52,202 DEBUG [o.a.c.e.o.NetworkOrchestrator] 
> (Work-Job-Executor-22:Job-105/Job-106 ctx-1996e983) Cleaning up because we're 
> unable to implement the network 
> Ntwk[38591d1e-5193-451c-beb0-854f44692880|Guest|8]
> 2014-03-31 00:16:52,209 DEBUG [o.a.c.e.o.NetworkOrchestrator] 
> (Work-Job-Executor-22:Job-105/Job-106 ctx-1996e983) Lock is acquired for 
> network Ntwk[38591d1e-5193-451c-beb0-854f44692880|Guest|8] as a part of 
> network shutdown
> 2014-03-31 00:16:52,227 DEBUG [o.a.c.e.o.NetworkOrchestrator] 
> (Work-Job-Executor-22:Job-105/Job-106 ctx-1996e983) Releasing 0 port 
> forwarding rules for network id=217 as a part of shutdownNetworkRules
> 2014-03-31 00:16:52,227 DEBUG [c.c.n.f.FirewallManagerImpl] 
> (Work-Job-Executor-22:Job-105/Job-106 ctx-1996e983) There are no rules to 
> forward to the network elements
> 2014-03-31 00:16:52,228 DEBUG [o.a.c.e.o.NetworkOrchestrator] 
> (Work-Job-Executor-22:Job-105/Job-106 ctx-1996e983) Releasing 0 static nat 
> rules for network id=217 as a part of shutdownNetworkRules
> Below is is the answer from agent  (6623669151955157207)
> 2014-03-30 23:17:41,320 WARN  [kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResource] 
> (agentRequest-Handler-5:null) Timed out: 
> /usr/share/cloudstack-common/scripts/network/domr/router_proxy.sh vr_cfg.sh 
> 169.254.3.129 -c /var/cache/cloud/VR-7f685597-fefe-407f-a767-d0e841f597a3.cfg 
> .  Output is:
> 2014-03-30 23:17:41,320 DEBUG [cloud.agent.Agent] 
> (agentRequest-Handler-5:null) Seq 1-6623669151955157207:  { Ans: , MgmtId: 
> 29066118877352, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, 
> [{"com.cloud.agent.api.Answer":{"result":false,"details":"process hasn't 
> exited","wait":0}}] }
> 2014-03-30 23:17:41,339 DEBUG [cloud.agent.Agent] 
> (agentRequest-Handler-5:null) Request:Seq 1-6623669151955157209:  { Cmd , 
> MgmtId: 29066118877352, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 100011, 
> [{"com.cloud.agent.api.routing.AggregationControlCommand":{"action":"Cleanup","accessDetails":{"router.guest.ip":"10.1.1.1","router.ip":"169.254.3.129","router.name":"r-21-QA"},"wait":0}}]
>  }
> 2014-03-30 23:17:41,339 DEBUG [cloud.agent.Agent] 
> (agentRequest-Handler-5:null) Processing command: 
> com.cloud.agent.api.routing.AggregationControlCommand
> 2014-03-30 23:17:41,339 DEBUG [cloud.agent.Agent] 
> (agentRequest-Handler-5:null) Seq 1-6623669151955157209:  { Ans: , MgmtId: 
> 29066118877352, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 10, 
> [{"com.cloud.agent.api.Answer":{"result":true,"wait":0}}] }



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to