HashCodeBuilder: expose typed hashing methods
-
Key: LANG-411
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-411
Project: Commons Lang
Issue Type: Wish
Affects Versions: 2.3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12567970#action_12567970
]
Henri Yandell commented on LANG-408:
[That length method is a recent add btw]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Henri Yandell updated LANG-386:
---
Fix Version/s: 3.0
LeftOf/RightOfNumber in Range convenience methods necessary
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Henri Yandell updated LANG-411:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.4)
3.0
Perhaps as a patch for ObjectUtils?
Making this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-119?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12567596#action_12567596
]
Niall Pemberton commented on IO-119:
@Gary - I agree with your general principles about
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-71?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12567562#action_12567562
]
Jukka Zitting commented on IO-71:
-
I see your point about the standard pipe streams, but I'd
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12567969#action_12567969
]
Henri Yandell commented on LANG-408:
I think it would be worse than:
if(
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JXPATH-117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12567541#action_12567541
]
David CroƩ commented on JXPATH-117:
---
Hi!
I'm really sorry looks like this bug allready
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-71?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12567767#action_12567767
]
David Smiley commented on IO-71:
Perhaps a pair of parallel classes would work out okay. But I