[jira] [Commented] (MATH-423) Upgrade all test code to Junit 4

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13011777#comment-13011777 ] Gilles commented on MATH-423: - I had a look into that, but it requires a version of Junit that

[jira] [Commented] (MATH-423) Upgrade all test code to Junit 4

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13011779#comment-13011779 ] Luc Maisonobe commented on MATH-423: Fine. I think we can upgrade our pom to the most

[jira] [Commented] (MATH-423) Upgrade all test code to Junit 4

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13011781#comment-13011781 ] Luc Maisonobe commented on MATH-423: Another reason for using a recent version is that

[jira] [Commented] (NET-217) TFTPServerPathTest fails in testWriteOutsideHome

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13011802#comment-13011802 ] Bogdan Drozdowski commented on NET-217: --- I had a similar problem with TCP Sockets -

[jira] [Commented] (NET-333) would you provide a class used for imap protocol?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13011804#comment-13011804 ] Sebb commented on NET-333: -- The sample code works fine with Dovecot. GMail does not seem to

[jira] [Resolved] (MATH-423) Upgrade all test code to Junit 4

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Luc Maisonobe resolved MATH-423. Resolution: Fixed Solved in subversion repository as of r1085954. Note that now the unit test need

[jira] [Created] (NET-392) Use enum for IMAPCommand

Use enum for IMAPCommand Key: NET-392 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-392 Project: Commons Net Issue Type: Sub-task Reporter: Sebb As mentioned in the main issue, I think it would be

[jira] [Created] (NET-393) Should the sendCommandWithID() methods be public?

Should the sendCommandWithID() methods be public? - Key: NET-393 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-393 Project: Commons Net Issue Type: Sub-task Reporter: Sebb

[jira] [Created] (NET-394) Are the sendUntaggedCommand() methods needed?

Are the sendUntaggedCommand() methods needed? - Key: NET-394 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-394 Project: Commons Net Issue Type: Sub-task Reporter: Sebb Are the

[jira] [Updated] (NET-320) Allow TFTPServer.java to bind to a specific network adapter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Bogdan Drozdowski updated NET-320: -- Attachment: tftp-bind.diff You probably only need to bind to a particular IP address, not to the

[jira] [Commented] (NET-333) would you provide a class used for imap protocol?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13011811#comment-13011811 ] Bogdan Drozdowski commented on NET-333: --- GMail doesn't seem to even support the port

[jira] [Commented] (NET-333) would you provide a class used for imap protocol?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13011815#comment-13011815 ] Sebb commented on NET-333: -- imapReply: why are the fields needed? I'd rather start with minimal

[jira] [Commented] (NET-393) Should the sendCommandWithID() methods be public?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13011817#comment-13011817 ] Sebb commented on NET-393: -- Note that users can override the protected generateCommandId() method if

[jira] [Issue Comment Edited] (NET-333) would you provide a class used for imap protocol?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13011815#comment-13011815 ] Sebb edited comment on NET-333 at 3/27/11 4:45 PM: --- imapReply: why are the

[jira] [Commented] (MATH-423) Upgrade all test code to Junit 4

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13011834#comment-13011834 ] Gilles commented on MATH-423: - [...] we need to find a way to implement a retry policy using

[jira] [Resolved] (NET-392) Use enum for IMAPCommand

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sebb resolved NET-392. -- Resolution: Fixed Use enum for IMAPCommand Key: NET-392

[jira] [Created] (MATH-551) Remove SerializablePair

Remove SerializablePair - Key: MATH-551 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-551 Project: Commons Math Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Gilles Assignee: Gilles Priority: Minor

[jira] [Commented] (NET-394) Are the sendUntaggedCommand() methods needed?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13011857#comment-13011857 ] Sebb commented on NET-394: -- The AuthenticatingIMAPClient currently uses sendUntaggedCommand(String)

[jira] [Resolved] (NET-394) Are the sendUntaggedCommand() methods needed?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sebb resolved NET-394. -- Resolution: Fixed Are the sendUntaggedCommand() methods needed? -

[jira] [Resolved] (NET-393) Should the sendCommandWithID() methods be public?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sebb resolved NET-393. -- Resolution: Fixed Should the sendCommandWithID() methods be public? -

[jira] [Resolved] (MATH-549) Suggestion: Make PearsonsCorrelation.correlation(double[], double[]) static

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gilles resolved MATH-549. - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 3.0 Revision 1086057. Suggestion: Make

[jira] [Resolved] (NET-333) would you provide a class used for imap protocol?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sebb resolved NET-333. -- Resolution: Fixed All major issues resolved now. would you provide a class used for imap protocol?

[jira] [Reopened] (MATH-423) Upgrade all test code to Junit 4

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gilles reopened MATH-423: - It is better to indicate explicitly which methods of a unit test class must be retried (and how many times) as it is

[jira] [Reopened] (MATH-549) Suggestion: Make PearsonsCorrelation.correlation(double[], double[]) static

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-549?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Phil Steitz reopened MATH-549: -- As stated, I would say WONT_FIX for this; but I am open to providing a utils class with static convenience

[jira] [Commented] (MATH-423) Upgrade all test code to Junit 4

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-423?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13011877#comment-13011877 ] Phil Steitz commented on MATH-423: -- I wonder if we really need the retry functionality any

[jira] [Created] (NET-395) Move ProtocolCommandSupport to SocketClient

Move ProtocolCommandSupport to SocketClient --- Key: NET-395 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-395 Project: Commons Net Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Sebb All the