[jira] [Updated] (JEXL-151) operators to manipulate j.u.Collection

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-151?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Henri Biestro updated JEXL-151: --- Fix Version/s: (was: Later) 3.0 > operators to manipulate j.u.Collection > --

[jira] [Comment Edited] (JEXL-151) operators to manipulate j.u.Collection

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-151?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642859#comment-14642859 ] Henri Biestro edited comment on JEXL-151 at 7/28/15 6:46 AM: - Af

[jira] [Created] (SANDBOX-500) Need a feature to re-execute same method, i.e. GOTO:

Sainath created SANDBOX-500: --- Summary: Need a feature to re-execute same method, i.e. GOTO: Key: SANDBOX-500 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SANDBOX-500 Project: Commons Sandbox Issue T

[jira] [Resolved] (POOL-298) Wrong jmxNameBase default value, unable to set jmxNamePrefix

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POOL-298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Phil Steitz resolved POOL-298. -- Resolution: Fixed Fixed in r1692973. > Wrong jmxNameBase default value, unable to set jmxNamePrefix > ---

[jira] [Updated] (POOL-298) Wrong jmxNameBase default value, unable to set jmxNamePrefix

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POOL-298?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Phil Steitz updated POOL-298: - Fix Version/s: (was: 2.5) 2.4.2 > Wrong jmxNameBase default value, unable to set jmxN

[jira] [Commented] (DAEMON-336) prunsrv crash on service stop

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-336?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14643520#comment-14643520 ] masc commented on DAEMON-336: - Similar issue with 1.0.15 on Windows 8.1 & embedded jre 1.8.0_5

[jira] [Resolved] (POOL-300) Abandoned object stack traces may not be written

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POOL-300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Phil Steitz resolved POOL-300. -- Resolution: Fixed Flush added to DefaultPooledObject printStackTrace in r1692943. > Abandoned object stac

[jira] [Commented] (JEXL-151) operators to manipulate j.u.Collection

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-151?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642859#comment-14642859 ] Dmitri Blinov commented on JEXL-151: After JEXL-170 has been implemented it is straight-

[jira] [Resolved] (JEXL-151) operators to manipulate j.u.Collection

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-151?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dmitri Blinov resolved JEXL-151. Resolution: Fixed > operators to manipulate j.u.Collection > -- >

[jira] [Created] (DAEMON-337) Docu-Bug on procrun page

Daniel created DAEMON-337: - Summary: Docu-Bug on procrun page Key: DAEMON-337 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-337 Project: Commons Daemon Issue Type: Bug Components: Procr

[jira] [Resolved] (LANG-1159) SerializationUtils.clone cannot be used with java.util.List and "type safety"

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Joerg Schaible resolved LANG-1159. -- Resolution: Invalid The compiler simply complains, that you did not provide a Serializable type a

[jira] [Created] (LANG-1159) SerializationUtils.clone cannot be used with java.util.List and "type safety"

Stefan Cordes created LANG-1159: --- Summary: SerializationUtils.clone cannot be used with java.util.List and "type safety" Key: LANG-1159 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1159 Project: Comm

[jira] [Resolved] (JEXL-170) Implement assignment operators

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-170?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Henri Biestro resolved JEXL-170. Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Henri Biestro Implemented operators, updated Javadoc, added tests, u

[jira] [Created] (JEXL-170) Implement assignment operators

Henri Biestro created JEXL-170: -- Summary: Implement assignment operators Key: JEXL-170 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-170 Project: Commons JEXL Issue Type: Improvement Affec

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (CONFIGURATION-605) XMLConfiguration drops configuration key immediately following one whose value contains a comma

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONFIGURATION-605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Emil Lundberg updated CONFIGURATION-605: Comment: was deleted (was: Good to hear, thanks! I haven't tested with versio

[jira] [Commented] (CONFIGURATION-605) XMLConfiguration drops configuration key immediately following one whose value contains a comma

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONFIGURATION-605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642440#comment-14642440 ] Emil Lundberg commented on CONFIGURATION-605: - Good to hear, thanks! I

[jira] [Comment Edited] (CONFIGURATION-605) XMLConfiguration drops configuration key immediately following one whose value contains a comma

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONFIGURATION-605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642433#comment-14642433 ] Emil Lundberg edited comment on CONFIGURATION-605 at 7/27/15 8:31 AM: ---

[jira] [Commented] (CONFIGURATION-605) XMLConfiguration drops configuration key immediately following one whose value contains a comma

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONFIGURATION-605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642433#comment-14642433 ] Emil Lundberg commented on CONFIGURATION-605: - Good to hear! I haven't

[jira] [Commented] (NET-495) Unsupported record version Unknown-48.48 - commons-net-3.1.jar

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14642429#comment-14642429 ] Ralf Hauser commented on NET-495: - maybe it now ignores a missing final answer as in the mail