[GitHub] [commons-vfs] abashev commented on issue #62: Don’t fail on openjdk-ea builds

abashev commented on issue #62: Don’t fail on openjdk-ea builds URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/62#issuecomment-487742500 @garydgregory done, but builds will take more time in compare to docker environment

[GitHub] [commons-vfs] abashev commented on issue #61: Fix CI builds for Java 11

abashev commented on issue #61: Fix CI builds for Java 11 URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/61#issuecomment-487742076 https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/62 This is an automated message from the Apache

[GitHub] [commons-vfs] abashev closed pull request #61: Fix CI builds for Java 11

abashev closed pull request #61: Fix CI builds for Java 11 URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/61 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and

[GitHub] [commons-vfs] garydgregory edited a comment on issue #62: Don’t fail on openjdk-ea builds

garydgregory edited a comment on issue #62: Don’t fail on openjdk-ea builds URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/62#issuecomment-487703396 I just don't understand why we have other builds in Commons that can use the OpenJDK EA without any issue. In this case, we can't we even

[GitHub] [commons-vfs] garydgregory commented on issue #62: Don’t fail on openjdk-ea builds

garydgregory commented on issue #62: Don’t fail on openjdk-ea builds URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/62#issuecomment-487703396 I just don't understand why we have other builds in Commons that can use the OpenJDK EA without any issue. In this case, we can't we even start to

[GitHub] [commons-vfs] abashev commented on issue #62: Don’t fail on openjdk-ea builds

abashev commented on issue #62: Don’t fail on openjdk-ea builds URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/62#issuecomment-487693912 @garydgregory yes, it is a Travis issue - there is no way to specify path or version, just `- openjdk-ea ` as the environment. So it is like

[GitHub] [commons-vfs] garydgregory commented on issue #61: Fix CI builds for Java 11

garydgregory commented on issue #61: Fix CI builds for Java 11 URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/61#issuecomment-487689007 It seems like this would apply to ALL Java setups, which I do not think is what we want. For Java EAs, we should either get it to work, or not

[GitHub] [commons-vfs] garydgregory commented on issue #62: Don’t fail on openjdk-ea builds

garydgregory commented on issue #62: Don’t fail on openjdk-ea builds URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/62#issuecomment-487680818 The problems seems like a Travis issue: ``` Installing openjdk-ea $ export JAVA_HOME=~/openjdk-ea $ export PATH="$JAVA_HOME/bin:$PATH"

[GitHub] [commons-vfs] abashev commented on issue #61: Fix CI builds for Java 11

abashev commented on issue #61: Fix CI builds for Java 11 URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/61#issuecomment-487661578 @garydgregory hm, ok, but travis builds should be green to get an understanding is everything alright. What do you think about this solution

[GitHub] [commons-vfs] garydgregory commented on issue #61: Fix CI builds for Java 11

garydgregory commented on issue #61: Fix CI builds for Java 11 URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/61#issuecomment-487639117 Thank you @abashev. I took a slightly different approach by activating a profile on Java 11 and above with the TLS arg line. This makes it

[GitHub] [commons-vfs] abashev opened a new pull request #62: Don’t fail on openjdk-ea builds

abashev opened a new pull request #62: Don’t fail on openjdk-ea builds URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/62 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to

[jira] [Resolved] (VFS-662) SftpFileSystem has Thread-safe issue about idleChannel

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gary Gregory resolved VFS-662. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.4 In git master. Please verify and close. > SftpFileSystem

[jira] [Work logged] (VFS-662) SftpFileSystem has Thread-safe issue about idleChannel

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-662?focusedWorklogId=234589=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-234589 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on VFS-662: -- Author: ASF GitHub Bot

[GitHub] [commons-vfs] asfgit closed pull request #36: fix for VFS-662: SftpFileSystem has Thread-safe issue about idleChannel

asfgit closed pull request #36: fix for VFS-662: SftpFileSystem has Thread-safe issue about idleChannel URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/36 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond

[GitHub] [commons-vfs] abashev commented on issue #61: Fix CI builds for Java 11

abashev commented on issue #61: Fix CI builds for Java 11 URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/61#issuecomment-487633110 @garydgregory done This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to

[GitHub] [commons-vfs] abashev commented on issue #36: fix for VFS-662: SftpFileSystem has Thread-safe issue about idleChannel

abashev commented on issue #36: fix for VFS-662: SftpFileSystem has Thread-safe issue about idleChannel URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/36#issuecomment-487626118 > This PR has nothing to do with concurrency but as I said @abashev's fork of VFS has some fixes in it which he

[GitHub] [commons-vfs] garydgregory commented on issue #61: Fix CI builds for Java 11

garydgregory commented on issue #61: Fix CI builds for Java 11 URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/61#issuecomment-487624983 You need to redo this PR: there appear to be many noisy changes due to line-ending changes or whitespace tab vs. space changes, or I do not know what.

[GitHub] [commons-vfs] abashev opened a new pull request #61: Fix CI builds for Java 11

abashev opened a new pull request #61: Fix CI builds for Java 11 URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/61 Bugfix for broken TLS 1.3 in latest Java 11 https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8211806 This is an

[jira] [Resolved] (VFS-711) [SFTP] SftpFileSystem can initialize underlying Session more than once while multithreading

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gary Gregory resolved VFS-711. -- Resolution: Fixed In git master. > [SFTP] SftpFileSystem can initialize underlying Session more than

[jira] [Created] (VFS-711) [SFTP] SftpFileSystem can initialize underlying Session more than once while multithreading

Gary Gregory created VFS-711: Summary: [SFTP] SftpFileSystem can initialize underlying Session more than once while multithreading Key: VFS-711 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-711 Project:

[jira] [Closed] (VFS-710) [SFTP] SftpFileSystem.getUid() can initialize underlying data more than once while multithreading

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gary Gregory closed VFS-710. Resolution: Fixed In git master. > [SFTP] SftpFileSystem.getUid() can initialize underlying data more than

[jira] [Commented] (STATISTICS-7) Stream-based Java statistical processing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STATISTICS-7?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16829243#comment-16829243 ] Gilles commented on STATISTICS-7: - Hi [~Udit Arora], {quote}this is kinda fun... {quote} Glad to hear.

[GitHub] [commons-vfs] garydgregory edited a comment on issue #36: fix for VFS-662: SftpFileSystem has Thread-safe issue about idleChannel

garydgregory edited a comment on issue #36: fix for VFS-662: SftpFileSystem has Thread-safe issue about idleChannel URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/36#issuecomment-487569796 So, in the DCL+volatile dept, I did this:

[jira] [Updated] (VFS-710) [SFTP] SftpFileSystem.getUid() can initialize underlying data more than once while multithreading

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-710?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gary Gregory updated VFS-710: - Description: [SFTP] SftpFileSystem.getUid() can initialize underlying data more than once while

[jira] [Created] (VFS-710) [SFTP] SftpFileSystem.getUid() can initialize underlying data more than once while multithreading

Gary Gregory created VFS-710: Summary: [SFTP] SftpFileSystem.getUid() can initialize underlying data more than once while multithreading Key: VFS-710 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-710

[GitHub] [commons-vfs] garydgregory edited a comment on issue #36: fix for VFS-662: SftpFileSystem has Thread-safe issue about idleChannel

garydgregory edited a comment on issue #36: fix for VFS-662: SftpFileSystem has Thread-safe issue about idleChannel URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/36#issuecomment-487569796 So, in the DCL+volatile dept, I did this:

[GitHub] [commons-vfs] garydgregory edited a comment on issue #36: fix for VFS-662: SftpFileSystem has Thread-safe issue about idleChannel

garydgregory edited a comment on issue #36: fix for VFS-662: SftpFileSystem has Thread-safe issue about idleChannel URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/36#issuecomment-487569796 So, in the DCL+volatile dept, I did this:

[GitHub] [commons-vfs] garydgregory commented on issue #36: fix for VFS-662: SftpFileSystem has Thread-safe issue about idleChannel

garydgregory commented on issue #36: fix for VFS-662: SftpFileSystem has Thread-safe issue about idleChannel URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/36#issuecomment-487569796 So, in the DCL+volatile dept, I did this:

[jira] [Closed] (VFS-709) [SFTP] SftpFileSystem.getGroupsIds() can initialize underlying data more than once while multithreading

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Gary Gregory closed VFS-709. Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 2.4 In git master. > [SFTP] SftpFileSystem.getGroupsIds() can

[jira] [Created] (VFS-709) [SFTP] SftpFileSystem.getGroupsIds() can initialize underlying data more than once while multithreading

Gary Gregory created VFS-709: Summary: [SFTP] SftpFileSystem.getGroupsIds() can initialize underlying data more than once while multithreading Key: VFS-709 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-709

[jira] [Work logged] (VFS-609) SFTP provider doesn't support a private key as byte array

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-609?focusedWorklogId=234489=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-234489 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on VFS-609: -- Author: ASF GitHub Bot

[GitHub] [commons-vfs] RoTkay closed pull request #60: VFS-609: VFS SFTP doesn't support a private key as byte array

RoTkay closed pull request #60: VFS-609: VFS SFTP doesn't support a private key as byte array URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/60 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the

[GitHub] [commons-vfs] RoTkay commented on issue #60: VFS-609: VFS SFTP doesn't support a private key as byte array

RoTkay commented on issue #60: VFS-609: VFS SFTP doesn't support a private key as byte array URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/60#issuecomment-487559722 Okey, saw your solution. Thanks for adding bytes approach! And thanks for your comments too :)

[GitHub] [commons-vfs] garydgregory commented on issue #36: fix for VFS-662: SftpFileSystem has Thread-safe issue about idleChannel

garydgregory commented on issue #36: fix for VFS-662: SftpFileSystem has Thread-safe issue about idleChannel URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/36#issuecomment-487553780 Well, let just deal with `SftpFileSystem` here... we can await for other PRs to come in... Gary

[GitHub] [commons-vfs] boris-petrov commented on issue #36: fix for VFS-662: SftpFileSystem has Thread-safe issue about idleChannel

boris-petrov commented on issue #36: fix for VFS-662: SftpFileSystem has Thread-safe issue about idleChannel URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/36#issuecomment-487551862 > The `session` ivar is not final and gets written in the private method `ensureSession()`, so it is

[GitHub] [commons-vfs] garydgregory commented on issue #60: VFS-609: VFS SFTP doesn't support a private key as byte array

garydgregory commented on issue #60: VFS-609: VFS SFTP doesn't support a private key as byte array URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/60#issuecomment-487551530 Please see git master and the new class `org.apache.commons.vfs2.provider.sftp.BytesIdentityInfo`.

[GitHub] [commons-vfs] garydgregory commented on issue #36: fix for VFS-662: SftpFileSystem has Thread-safe issue about idleChannel

garydgregory commented on issue #36: fix for VFS-662: SftpFileSystem has Thread-safe issue about idleChannel URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/36#issuecomment-487550969 > @garydgregory, @ottobackwards - in that regards, please take a look at [this

[GitHub] [commons-vfs] garydgregory commented on issue #36: fix for VFS-662: SftpFileSystem has Thread-safe issue about idleChannel

garydgregory commented on issue #36: fix for VFS-662: SftpFileSystem has Thread-safe issue about idleChannel URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/36#issuecomment-487550096 Hi All: Back to https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/36#issuecomment-487393002: The

[GitHub] [commons-vfs] boris-petrov commented on issue #36: fix for VFS-662: SftpFileSystem has Thread-safe issue about idleChannel

boris-petrov commented on issue #36: fix for VFS-662: SftpFileSystem has Thread-safe issue about idleChannel URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/36#issuecomment-487548091 @garydgregory, @ottobackwards - in that regards, please take a look at [this

[GitHub] [commons-vfs] garydgregory commented on issue #36: fix for VFS-662: SftpFileSystem has Thread-safe issue about idleChannel

garydgregory commented on issue #36: fix for VFS-662: SftpFileSystem has Thread-safe issue about idleChannel URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/36#issuecomment-487547136 I'll second @boris-petrov's comment. We've been patching problems here and there when they pop up. I'm

[GitHub] [commons-vfs] boris-petrov commented on issue #36: fix for VFS-662: SftpFileSystem has Thread-safe issue about idleChannel

boris-petrov commented on issue #36: fix for VFS-662: SftpFileSystem has Thread-safe issue about idleChannel URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/36#issuecomment-487544065 @ottobackwards - well, I've been using VFS for a while now in a multi-threaded environment and it mostly

[GitHub] [commons-vfs] ottobackwards commented on issue #36: fix for VFS-662: SftpFileSystem has Thread-safe issue about idleChannel

ottobackwards commented on issue #36: fix for VFS-662: SftpFileSystem has Thread-safe issue about idleChannel URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/36#issuecomment-487534197 I'm just going to raise my hand and say from what I've seen, I didn't think VFS was thread safe. Even

[jira] [Created] (LANG-1454) ToStringStyle.appendClassName() should use isUseShortClassName()

Giorgio Vespucci created LANG-1454: -- Summary: ToStringStyle.appendClassName() should use isUseShortClassName() Key: LANG-1454 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1454 Project: Commons

[jira] [Commented] (GEOMETRY-32) BSPTree Updates

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEOMETRY-32?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16828942#comment-16828942 ] Gilles commented on GEOMETRY-32: bq. not hold up progress on other issues that might depend on this.