[jira] [Work logged] (IO-628) Migration Commons-IO to JUnit Jupiter

2019-10-01 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-628?focusedWorklogId=321694=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-321694 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on IO-628: - Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created

[GitHub] [commons-io] mureinik edited a comment on issue #97: IO-628: Migration to JUnit Jupiter

2019-10-01 Thread GitBox
mureinik edited a comment on issue #97: IO-628: Migration to JUnit Jupiter URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/97#issuecomment-537345970 > Hi @mureinik, > > Thank you for your update. > It seems like in `TailerTest` there should be a cleaner way to tear down tests than

[jira] [Work logged] (IO-628) Migration Commons-IO to JUnit Jupiter

2019-10-01 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-628?focusedWorklogId=321692=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-321692 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on IO-628: - Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created

[GitHub] [commons-io] mureinik commented on issue #97: IO-628: Migration to JUnit Jupiter

2019-10-01 Thread GitBox
mureinik commented on issue #97: IO-628: Migration to JUnit Jupiter URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/97#issuecomment-537345970 > Hi @mureinik, > > Thank you for your update. > It seems like in `TailerTest` there should be a cleaner way to tear down tests than by

[jira] [Work logged] (IO-628) Migration Commons-IO to JUnit Jupiter

2019-10-01 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-628?focusedWorklogId=321634=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-321634 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on IO-628: - Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created

[GitHub] [commons-io] garydgregory commented on issue #97: IO-628: Migration to JUnit Jupiter

2019-10-01 Thread GitBox
garydgregory commented on issue #97: IO-628: Migration to JUnit Jupiter URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/97#issuecomment-537281705 Hi @mureinik, Thank you for your update. It seems like in `TailerTest` there should be a cleaner way to tear down tests than by calling

[jira] [Commented] (COLLECTIONS-728) BloomFilter contribution

2019-10-01 Thread Gilles Sadowski (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16942393#comment-16942393 ] Gilles Sadowski commented on COLLECTIONS-728: - Thanks for the removal of

[jira] [Commented] (COLLECTIONS-728) BloomFilter contribution

2019-10-01 Thread Claude Warren (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16942269#comment-16942269 ] Claude Warren commented on COLLECTIONS-728: --- Updated pull request to include latest

[GitHub] [commons-beanutils] melloware commented on issue #7: BEANUTILS-520: Mitigate CVE-2014-0114 by enabling SuppressPropertiesB…

2019-10-01 Thread GitBox
melloware commented on issue #7: BEANUTILS-520: Mitigate CVE-2014-0114 by enabling SuppressPropertiesB… URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-beanutils/pull/7#issuecomment-537182968 I think the seucrity violation is being able to set the property using property utils. Reading it would

[GitHub] [commons-beanutils] dguiney commented on issue #7: BEANUTILS-520: Mitigate CVE-2014-0114 by enabling SuppressPropertiesB…

2019-10-01 Thread GitBox
dguiney commented on issue #7: BEANUTILS-520: Mitigate CVE-2014-0114 by enabling SuppressPropertiesB… URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-beanutils/pull/7#issuecomment-537179737 Just to follow up. If the security violation is because of trying to access the properties of "class" . Why

[GitHub] [commons-beanutils] dguiney commented on issue #7: BEANUTILS-520: Mitigate CVE-2014-0114 by enabling SuppressPropertiesB…

2019-10-01 Thread GitBox
dguiney commented on issue #7: BEANUTILS-520: Mitigate CVE-2014-0114 by enabling SuppressPropertiesB… URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-beanutils/pull/7#issuecomment-537179020 Perfect. thanks @melloware This is an

[GitHub] [commons-beanutils] melloware commented on issue #7: BEANUTILS-520: Mitigate CVE-2014-0114 by enabling SuppressPropertiesB…

2019-10-01 Thread GitBox
melloware commented on issue #7: BEANUTILS-520: Mitigate CVE-2014-0114 by enabling SuppressPropertiesB… URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-beanutils/pull/7#issuecomment-537178017 Your code is wrong. Change to.. ```java BeanMap beanMap = new BeanMap(oldObject);

[GitHub] [commons-beanutils] dguiney edited a comment on issue #7: BEANUTILS-520: Mitigate CVE-2014-0114 by enabling SuppressPropertiesB…

2019-10-01 Thread GitBox
dguiney edited a comment on issue #7: BEANUTILS-520: Mitigate CVE-2014-0114 by enabling SuppressPropertiesB… URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-beanutils/pull/7#issuecomment-537176485 I upgraded my lib to 1.9.4 and added the suggested opt-out to my code. But

[GitHub] [commons-beanutils] dguiney edited a comment on issue #7: BEANUTILS-520: Mitigate CVE-2014-0114 by enabling SuppressPropertiesB…

2019-10-01 Thread GitBox
dguiney edited a comment on issue #7: BEANUTILS-520: Mitigate CVE-2014-0114 by enabling SuppressPropertiesB… URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-beanutils/pull/7#issuecomment-537176485 I upgraded my lib to 1.9.4 and added the suggested opt-out to my code. But

[GitHub] [commons-beanutils] dguiney edited a comment on issue #7: BEANUTILS-520: Mitigate CVE-2014-0114 by enabling SuppressPropertiesB…

2019-10-01 Thread GitBox
dguiney edited a comment on issue #7: BEANUTILS-520: Mitigate CVE-2014-0114 by enabling SuppressPropertiesB… URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-beanutils/pull/7#issuecomment-537176485 I upgraded my lib to 1.9.4 and added the suggested opt-out to my code. But

[GitHub] [commons-beanutils] dguiney commented on issue #7: BEANUTILS-520: Mitigate CVE-2014-0114 by enabling SuppressPropertiesB…

2019-10-01 Thread GitBox
dguiney commented on issue #7: BEANUTILS-520: Mitigate CVE-2014-0114 by enabling SuppressPropertiesB… URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-beanutils/pull/7#issuecomment-537176485 I upgraded my lib to 1.9.4 and added the suggested opt-out to my code. But

[GitHub] [commons-rng] coveralls edited a comment on issue #72: RNG-120: Fix security issues in serialization code for Random instances.

2019-10-01 Thread GitBox
coveralls edited a comment on issue #72: RNG-120: Fix security issues in serialization code for Random instances. URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-rng/pull/72#issuecomment-536793625 [![Coverage

[jira] [Commented] (RNG-120) Fix security issues in serialization code for Random instances

2019-10-01 Thread Alex Herbert (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RNG-120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16942109#comment-16942109 ] Alex Herbert commented on RNG-120: -- {quote}But how can one be sure? {quote} I suppose you can be sure if

[jira] [Commented] (VFS-643) VFS should not log at the INFO level

2019-10-01 Thread Gary D. Gregory (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-643?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16942105#comment-16942105 ] Gary D. Gregory commented on VFS-643: - What version and what do you see? PRs are welcome on GutHub. >

[jira] [Commented] (JEXL-307) Variable redeclaration option

2019-10-01 Thread Dmitri Blinov (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16942085#comment-16942085 ] Dmitri Blinov commented on JEXL-307: If new feature, through configuration on engine level, or via

[jira] [Commented] (RNG-120) Fix security issues in serialization code for Random instances

2019-10-01 Thread Gilles Sadowski (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RNG-120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16942078#comment-16942078 ] Gilles Sadowski commented on RNG-120: - bq. Yes. You can use them if you are sure that the object that

[jira] [Commented] (VFS-643) VFS should not log at the INFO level

2019-10-01 Thread Bas van Driel (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-643?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16942029#comment-16942029 ] Bas van Driel commented on VFS-643: --- Hi, I see that in current versions of vfs, there is INFO logging

[jira] [Updated] (JEXL-315) JxltEngine literal string strings ending in \ $ or # throw JxltEngine$Exception

2019-10-01 Thread Henri Biestro (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-315?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Henri Biestro updated JEXL-315: --- Fix Version/s: 3.2 > JxltEngine literal string strings ending in \ $ or # throw >

[jira] [Updated] (JEXL-315) JxltEngine literal string strings ending in \ $ or # throw JxltEngine$Exception

2019-10-01 Thread Henri Biestro (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-315?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Henri Biestro updated JEXL-315: --- Assignee: Henri Biestro > JxltEngine literal string strings ending in \ $ or # throw >

[jira] [Comment Edited] (JEXL-307) Variable redeclaration option

2019-10-01 Thread Henri Biestro (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16941873#comment-16941873 ] Henri Biestro edited comment on JEXL-307 at 10/1/19 1:54 PM: - Of course, the

[jira] [Commented] (JEXL-307) Variable redeclaration option

2019-10-01 Thread Henri Biestro (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16941873#comment-16941873 ] Henri Biestro commented on JEXL-307: Of course, the behaviour wrt local variables / parameters is what

[jira] [Commented] (JEXL-307) Variable redeclaration option

2019-10-01 Thread Dmitri Blinov (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16941774#comment-16941774 ] Dmitri Blinov commented on JEXL-307: Right now we have three scopes for a variable - context scope,

[jira] [Commented] (RNG-120) Fix security issues in serialization code for Random instances

2019-10-01 Thread Alex Herbert (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RNG-120?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16941766#comment-16941766 ] Alex Herbert commented on RNG-120: -- {quote}Is there any correct use for methods writeObject and readObject?

[jira] [Updated] (JEXL-307) Variable redeclaration option

2019-10-01 Thread Dmitri Blinov (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dmitri Blinov updated JEXL-307: --- Description: As of now, JEXL allows a script writer to redeclare a local variable during script

[jira] [Updated] (JEXL-307) Variable redeclaration option

2019-10-01 Thread Dmitri Blinov (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Dmitri Blinov updated JEXL-307: --- Description: As of now, JEXL allows a script writer to redeclare a local variable during script

[jira] [Work logged] (IO-628) Migration Commons-IO to JUnit Jupiter

2019-10-01 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-628?focusedWorklogId=321174=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-321174 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on IO-628: - Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created

[GitHub] [commons-io] mureinik commented on issue #97: IO-628: Migration to JUnit Jupiter

2019-10-01 Thread GitBox
mureinik commented on issue #97: IO-628: Migration to JUnit Jupiter URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/97#issuecomment-536980943 > The build you point to https://travis-ci.org/apache/commons-io/jobs/591248951 is a Java 14-EA build, I do not think we need to worry that JaCoCo

[jira] [Work logged] (IO-628) Migration Commons-IO to JUnit Jupiter

2019-10-01 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-628?focusedWorklogId=321168=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-321168 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on IO-628: - Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created

[GitHub] [commons-io] coveralls edited a comment on issue #97: IO-628: Migration to JUnit Jupiter

2019-10-01 Thread GitBox
coveralls edited a comment on issue #97: IO-628: Migration to JUnit Jupiter URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/97#issuecomment-536759544 [![Coverage Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/26036732/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/26036732) Coverage increased (+0.1%)

[jira] [Work logged] (IO-628) Migration Commons-IO to JUnit Jupiter

2019-10-01 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-628?focusedWorklogId=321163=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-321163 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on IO-628: - Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created

[GitHub] [commons-io] mureinik opened a new pull request #97: IO-628: Migration to JUnit Jupiter

2019-10-01 Thread GitBox
mureinik opened a new pull request #97: IO-628: Migration to JUnit Jupiter URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/97 This PR upgrades the project's testing framework from JUnit 4.12 to the modern JUnit Jupiter 5.5.4. Since JUnit 5 Jupiter is not backwards compatible to JUnit

[jira] [Work logged] (IO-628) Migration Commons-IO to JUnit Jupiter

2019-10-01 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-628?focusedWorklogId=321162=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-321162 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on IO-628: - Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created

[GitHub] [commons-io] mureinik closed pull request #97: IO-628: Migration to JUnit Jupiter

2019-10-01 Thread GitBox
mureinik closed pull request #97: IO-628: Migration to JUnit Jupiter URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/97 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to

[jira] [Work logged] (IO-628) Migration Commons-IO to JUnit Jupiter

2019-10-01 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-628?focusedWorklogId=321160=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-321160 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on IO-628: - Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created

[jira] [Work logged] (IO-628) Migration Commons-IO to JUnit Jupiter

2019-10-01 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-628?focusedWorklogId=321159=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-321159 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on IO-628: - Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created

[GitHub] [commons-io] mureinik closed pull request #97: IO-628: Migration to JUnit Jupiter

2019-10-01 Thread GitBox
mureinik closed pull request #97: IO-628: Migration to JUnit Jupiter URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/97 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to

[GitHub] [commons-io] mureinik opened a new pull request #97: IO-628: Migration to JUnit Jupiter

2019-10-01 Thread GitBox
mureinik opened a new pull request #97: IO-628: Migration to JUnit Jupiter URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/97 This PR upgrades the project's testing framework from JUnit 4.12 to the modern JUnit Jupiter 5.5.4. Since JUnit 5 Jupiter is not backwards compatible to JUnit

[GitHub] [commons-lang] Lysergid commented on issue #416: Add support of lazy default value evaluation for defaulting methods

2019-10-01 Thread GitBox
Lysergid commented on issue #416: Add support of lazy default value evaluation for defaulting methods URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/416#issuecomment-536959739 Not sure if this is better now. Compiler cannot derive type from lambda so I have to explicitly declare type or

[jira] [Work logged] (IO-628) Migration Commons-IO to JUnit Jupiter

2019-10-01 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-628?focusedWorklogId=321138=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-321138 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on IO-628: - Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created

[GitHub] [commons-io] coveralls edited a comment on issue #97: IO-628: Migration to JUnit Jupiter

2019-10-01 Thread GitBox
coveralls edited a comment on issue #97: IO-628: Migration to JUnit Jupiter URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/97#issuecomment-536759544 [![Coverage Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/26035272/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/26035272) Coverage increased (+0.1%)

[GitHub] [commons-lang] coveralls edited a comment on issue #416: Add support of lazy default value evaluation for defaulting methods

2019-10-01 Thread GitBox
coveralls edited a comment on issue #416: Add support of lazy default value evaluation for defaulting methods URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/416#issuecomment-481641411 [![Coverage

[jira] [Work logged] (LANG-1366) Add Feature for No ClassName and MultiLine StringStyle

2019-10-01 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1366?focusedWorklogId=321133=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-321133 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on LANG-1366: Author: ASF GitHub Bot

[GitHub] [commons-lang] smolnar82 commented on issue #308: LANG-1366 : Add Feature for No ClassName and MultiLine StringStyle

2019-10-01 Thread GitBox
smolnar82 commented on issue #308: LANG-1366 : Add Feature for No ClassName and MultiLine StringStyle URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/308#issuecomment-536945257 It would be great to add this new TSS. Thanks!

[jira] [Work logged] (IO-628) Migration Commons-IO to JUnit Jupiter

2019-10-01 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-628?focusedWorklogId=321132=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-321132 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on IO-628: - Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created

[GitHub] [commons-io] coveralls edited a comment on issue #97: IO-628: Migration to JUnit Jupiter

2019-10-01 Thread GitBox
coveralls edited a comment on issue #97: IO-628: Migration to JUnit Jupiter URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/97#issuecomment-536759544 [![Coverage Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/26034934/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/26034934) Coverage increased (+0.07%)

[jira] [Work logged] (IO-628) Migration Commons-IO to JUnit Jupiter

2019-10-01 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-628?focusedWorklogId=321128=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-321128 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on IO-628: - Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created

[jira] [Work logged] (IO-628) Migration Commons-IO to JUnit Jupiter

2019-10-01 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-628?focusedWorklogId=321129=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-321129 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on IO-628: - Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created

[GitHub] [commons-io] mureinik closed pull request #97: IO-628: Migration to JUnit Jupiter

2019-10-01 Thread GitBox
mureinik closed pull request #97: IO-628: Migration to JUnit Jupiter URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/97 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to

[GitHub] [commons-io] mureinik opened a new pull request #97: IO-628: Migration to JUnit Jupiter

2019-10-01 Thread GitBox
mureinik opened a new pull request #97: IO-628: Migration to JUnit Jupiter URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/97 This PR upgrades the project's testing framework from JUnit 4.12 to the modern JUnit Jupiter 5.5.4. Since JUnit 5 Jupiter is not backwards compatible to JUnit

[jira] [Work logged] (IO-628) Migration Commons-IO to JUnit Jupiter

2019-10-01 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-628?focusedWorklogId=321124=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-321124 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on IO-628: - Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created

[jira] [Work logged] (IO-628) Migration Commons-IO to JUnit Jupiter

2019-10-01 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-628?focusedWorklogId=321123=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-321123 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on IO-628: - Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created

[GitHub] [commons-io] mureinik closed pull request #97: IO-628: Migration to JUnit Jupiter

2019-10-01 Thread GitBox
mureinik closed pull request #97: IO-628: Migration to JUnit Jupiter URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/97 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to

[jira] [Work logged] (IO-628) Migration Commons-IO to JUnit Jupiter

2019-10-01 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-628?focusedWorklogId=321117=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-321117 ] ASF GitHub Bot logged work on IO-628: - Author: ASF GitHub Bot Created

[GitHub] [commons-io] coveralls edited a comment on issue #97: IO-628: Migration to JUnit Jupiter

2019-10-01 Thread GitBox
coveralls edited a comment on issue #97: IO-628: Migration to JUnit Jupiter URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/97#issuecomment-536759544 [![Coverage Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/26034296/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/26034296) Coverage remained the same

[jira] [Comment Edited] (JEXL-316) Operator ?? has very low priority

2019-10-01 Thread Dmitri Blinov (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16941603#comment-16941603 ] Dmitri Blinov edited comment on JEXL-316 at 10/1/19 7:24 AM: - The difference is

[jira] [Commented] (JEXL-316) Operator ?? has very low priority

2019-10-01 Thread Dmitri Blinov (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JEXL-316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16941603#comment-16941603 ] Dmitri Blinov commented on JEXL-316: The difference is subtle yet significant. The ability of elvis