Matt Juntunen created GEOMETRY-101:
--
Summary: STL Reader/Writer
Key: GEOMETRY-101
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEOMETRY-101
Project: Apache Commons Geometry
Issue Type: New
nhojpatrick commented on pull request #58:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-codec/pull/58#issuecomment-674417944
@garydgregory have sent email to dev ML regarding these PR and also what
maven wrapper is etc
This is an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCS-198?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Vandahl resolved JCS-198.
Fix Version/s: jcs-3.0
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
> ConcurrentException in update of
coveralls edited a comment on pull request #142:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/142#issuecomment-674389767
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/32776885)
Coverage increased (+0.06%) to 90.006% when pulling
coveralls edited a comment on pull request #608:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/608#issuecomment-674390105
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/32776826)
Coverage remained the same at 94.704% when pulling
nhojpatrick commented on a change in pull request #58:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-codec/pull/58#discussion_r470983164
##
File path: .mvn/wrapper/MavenWrapperDownloader.java
##
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright 2007-present the original author or authors.
Review
nhojpatrick commented on pull request #58:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-codec/pull/58#issuecomment-674397112
@garydgregory the scripts should not be hacked locally. I executed `mvn -N
io.takari:maven:0.7.7:wrapper` and added the changes. Maven v3.7.0 will have a
similar command
garydgregory commented on pull request #58:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-codec/pull/58#issuecomment-674396085
This seems like a lot to add and _maintain_ for each Apache Component... and
who is going to maintain so many copies? Esp when someone will hack one script
and not
garydgregory commented on a change in pull request #58:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-codec/pull/58#discussion_r470977126
##
File path: .mvn/wrapper/MavenWrapperDownloader.java
##
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright 2007-present the original author or authors.
Review
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1596?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17178254#comment-17178254
]
Gary D. Gregory commented on LANG-1596:
---
ok, ty, closing.
> ArrayUtils.toPrimitive(Object) does
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1596?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gary D. Gregory closed LANG-1596.
-
> ArrayUtils.toPrimitive(Object) does not support boolean and other types
>
coveralls edited a comment on pull request #58:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-codec/pull/58#issuecomment-674387965
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/32776673)
Coverage remained the same at 93.976% when pulling
nhojpatrick opened a new pull request #17:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-parent/pull/17
Maven 3.7.0 will introduce a maven wrapper that is based upon the takari
maven wrapper.
The advantage of using a maven wrapper is that it puts the control over what
maven version to be
coveralls commented on pull request #608:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/608#issuecomment-674390105
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/32776495)
Coverage remained the same at 94.704% when pulling
coveralls commented on pull request #142:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/142#issuecomment-674389767
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/32776489)
Coverage remained the same at 89.943% when pulling
nhojpatrick opened a new pull request #17:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-logging/pull/17
Maven 3.7.0 will introduce a maven wrapper that is based upon the takari
maven wrapper.
The advantage of using a maven wrapper is that it puts the control over what
maven version to be
nhojpatrick opened a new pull request #608:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/608
Maven 3.7.0 will introduce a maven wrapper that is based upon the takari
maven wrapper.
The advantage of using a maven wrapper is that it puts the control over what
maven version to be
nhojpatrick commented on pull request #58:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-codec/pull/58#issuecomment-674388396
@chtompki I'm going to be doing similar all afternoon for all the other
apache commons projects i actively/regularly use
nhojpatrick opened a new pull request #142:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/142
Maven 3.7.0 will introduce a maven wrapper that is based upon the takari
maven wrapper.
The advantage of using a maven wrapper is that it puts the control over what
maven version to be
nhojpatrick opened a new pull request #64:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-configuration/pull/64
Maven 3.7.0 will introduce a maven wrapper that is based upon the takari
maven wrapper.
The advantage of using a maven wrapper is that it puts the control over what
maven version
coveralls commented on pull request #58:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-codec/pull/58#issuecomment-674387965
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/32776386)
Coverage remained the same at 93.976% when pulling
nhojpatrick opened a new pull request #175:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-collections/pull/175
Maven 3.7.0 will introduce a maven wrapper that is based upon the takari
maven wrapper.
The advantage of using a maven wrapper is that it puts the control over what
maven version
chtompki commented on pull request #58:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-codec/pull/58#issuecomment-674387295
Will try to get to looking at this today. Many thanks for the effort here :-)
This is an automated message
nhojpatrick opened a new pull request #58:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-codec/pull/58
Maven 3.7.0 will introduce a maven wrapper that is based upon the takari
maven wrapper.
The advantage of using a maven wrapper is that it puts the control over what
maven version to be
coveralls edited a comment on pull request #41:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-codec/pull/41#issuecomment-594154263
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/32776168)
Coverage remained the same at 93.976% when pulling
coveralls edited a comment on pull request #43:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-codec/pull/43#issuecomment-594402309
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/32776167)
Coverage remained the same at 93.976% when pulling
coveralls edited a comment on pull request #42:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-codec/pull/42#issuecomment-594154289
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/32776164)
Coverage remained the same at 93.976% when pulling
coveralls edited a comment on pull request #40:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-codec/pull/40#issuecomment-593569195
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/32776162)
Coverage remained the same at 93.976% when pulling
coveralls edited a comment on pull request #39:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-codec/pull/39#issuecomment-593127679
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/32776020)
Coverage remained the same at 93.976% when pulling
coveralls edited a comment on pull request #39:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-codec/pull/39#issuecomment-593127679
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/32776011)
Coverage remained the same at 93.976% when pulling
coveralls edited a comment on pull request #38:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-codec/pull/38#issuecomment-593125439
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/32775966)
Coverage remained the same at 93.976% when pulling
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMPRESS-546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17178221#comment-17178221
]
Peter Lee commented on COMPRESS-546:
Hi [~zuevmaxim]
The zip64 extra fields are all null. I
coveralls edited a comment on pull request #42:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-codec/pull/42#issuecomment-594154289
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/32775876)
Coverage remained the same at 93.976% when pulling
coveralls edited a comment on pull request #39:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-codec/pull/39#issuecomment-593127679
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/32775853)
Coverage remained the same at 93.976% when pulling
coveralls edited a comment on pull request #38:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-codec/pull/38#issuecomment-593125439
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/32775828)
Coverage remained the same at 93.976% when pulling
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1596?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17178212#comment-17178212
]
Richard Eckart de Castilho commented on LANG-1596:
--
Looks good. I cannot set the ticket
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMPRESS-542?focusedWorklogId=471054=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-471054
]
ASF GitHub Bot logged work on COMPRESS-542:
---
Author: ASF GitHub Bot
theobisproject commented on pull request #120:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-compress/pull/120#issuecomment-674373279
I am using this project https://github.com/rohanpadhye/jqf to do the fuzzing
via the AFL bridge provided. This was the fuzz method implementation I used
```java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1576?focusedWorklogId=471050=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-471050
]
ASF GitHub Bot logged work on LANG-1576:
Author: ASF GitHub Bot
sebbASF commented on pull request #565:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/565#issuecomment-674371834
I think the current huge list of input strings is more about testing
functionality rather than performance.
The method only cares about 3 characters: CR, LF or
40 matches
Mail list logo
