[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17449396#comment-17449396
]
L commented on VFS-807:
---
[~ggregory] : yes, it can be closed.
> LocalFile migration to NIO is not done correctly
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17394698#comment-17394698
]
L commented on VFS-807:
---
[~ggregory]
I am using Windows 10 and jdk 8 as well.
The thing is: you did not correctly
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17394536#comment-17394536
]
L commented on VFS-807:
---
[~ggregory]: thanks for pushing the tests.
As for "the tests pass without the change to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17391433#comment-17391433
]
L commented on VFS-807:
---
I have added some tests verifying the bug. I did not succeed creating a PR.
The attached
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
L updated VFS-807:
--
Attachment: vfs-807.diff
> LocalFile migration to NIO is not done correctly
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
L reopened VFS-807:
---
Reopening: the fix is not complete.
It fixes only part of the problem: overwriting the existing file.
The second part: appending
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
L updated VFS-807:
--
Priority: Blocker (was: Critical)
> LocalFile migration to NIO is not done correctly
>
L created VFS-807:
-
Summary: LocalFile migration to NIO is not done correctly
Key: VFS-807
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-807
Project: Commons VFS
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 2.9.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-289?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17121448#comment-17121448
]
venkata ramana reddy L commented on CODEC-289:
--
[~aherbert] - When is the release of 1.15
Alex L created JCS-186:
--
Summary: Lateral cache replication is not working with UDP
discovery
Key: JCS-186
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCS-186
Project: Commons JCS
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16296810#comment-16296810
]
L edited comment on VFS-590 at 12/19/17 1:51 PM:
-
I do not know how and when this issue will
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16296810#comment-16296810
]
L commented on VFS-590:
---
I do not know how and when this issue will be fixed.
There is a more active discussion of a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16296786#comment-16296786
]
L commented on VFS-590:
---
As I wrote in the description:
{quote}Performing moveTo without this check might successfully
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16226410#comment-16226410
]
L commented on VFS-589:
---
The fix looks OK. As for verifying it: I have proposed a test to verify the
fix, see
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16218961#comment-16218961
]
L commented on VFS-589:
---
Sorry, what "complexity"? diff file of 64 lines patching two java files?
Letting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-640?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16139746#comment-16139746
]
L commented on VFS-640:
---
Well, if it is called recursively for layered filesystems, it is *different*
provider, I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-640?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16139687#comment-16139687
]
L edited comment on VFS-640 at 8/24/17 7:19 AM:
Avoiding slow connection would be nice but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-640?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
L updated VFS-640:
--
Attachment: patch_VFS640.diff
ParallelConnTest.java
patch_VFS640.diff: the patch
ParallelConnTest.java: the test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-640?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16139687#comment-16139687
]
L commented on VFS-640:
---
Avoiding slow connection would be nice but unfortunately we do not have that
luxury.
I have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-640?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
L updated VFS-640:
--
Description:
Currently (rev. 1802455) this method looks like this:
{code:java}
protected synchronized FileSystem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-640?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
L updated VFS-640:
--
Description:
Currently (rev. 1802455) this method looks like this:
{code:java}
protected synchronized FileSystem
L created VFS-640:
-
Summary: Synchronized
AbstractOriginatingFileProvider.getFileSystem is too broad
Key: VFS-640
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-640
Project: Commons VFS
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15956494#comment-15956494
]
L commented on VFS-617:
---
The thing is: this operation would always fail, no matter where it is invoked,
on move() or
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-617?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15956457#comment-15956457
]
L commented on VFS-617:
---
Looks like a duplicate of VFS-590.
> isReadable fails if unable to determine group identity
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15956456#comment-15956456
]
L commented on VFS-630:
---
It is a duplicate of VFS-590.
> Sftp code assumes that exec channels are available and *nix
L created VFS-589:
-
Summary: SFTP moveTo operation hangs if the server does not
support SSH channelExec.
Key: VFS-589
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-589
Project: Commons VFS
Issue Type: Bug
L created VFS-590:
-
Summary: SFTP moveTo operation might fail on permission checks
even if the operation itself might succeed
Key: VFS-590
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-590
Project: Commons VFS
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
L updated VFS-590:
--
Description:
Continuing with SFTP moveTo, see VFS-588 and VFS-589 for more details.
The permission checks that VFS performs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
L updated VFS-589:
--
Attachment: patch_sftp_tests_hang_no_exec.diff
Patch to the test (SftpProviderTestCase) to reproduce the issue
> SFTP moveTo
L created VFS-588:
-
Summary: SftpProviderTestCase is not robbust in case a timeout is
configured
Key: VFS-588
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-588
Project: Commons VFS
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
L updated VFS-588:
--
Attachment: patch_hang_with_tout.diff
The patch that enables timeout configuration.
> SftpProviderTestCase is not robbust in case
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-559?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15029007#comment-15029007
]
L commented on VFS-559:
---
Yes, the error is fixed.
> FTPClientWrapper is not robust against some failures
>
L created VFS-580:
-
Summary: Improve FTP error messages
Key: VFS-580
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-580
Project: Commons VFS
Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: Nightly Builds, 2.1
L created VFS-581:
-
Summary: FTPClientWrapper hides important error information
Key: VFS-581
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-581
Project: Commons VFS
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14283917#comment-14283917
]
L commented on VFS-558:
---
Re: Thanks for testing! I really hope to release soon (so you better not find
L created VFS-559:
-
Summary: FTPClientWrapper is not robust against some failures
Key: VFS-559
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-559
Project: Commons VFS
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14282815#comment-14282815
]
L commented on VFS-558:
---
Re: Anyway, I fixed the rename in trunk, can you try?
Yes, it is fixed,
L created VFS-558:
-
Summary: java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException in FtpFileObject
Key: VFS-558
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-558
Project: Commons VFS
Issue Type: Bug
Affects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14281942#comment-14281942
]
L edited comment on VFS-558 at 1/18/15 8:18 PM:
Re: BTW2: do you use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14281944#comment-14281944
]
L commented on VFS-558:
---
Re: BTW2: do you use OnCallRefresher on purpose, I can imagine that makes FTP
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
L updated VFS-558:
--
Comment: was deleted
(was: Re: BTW2: do you use OnCallRefresher on purpose, I can imagine that makes
FTP quite slow.
Well, I do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14281943#comment-14281943
]
L commented on VFS-558:
---
Re: BTW2: do you use OnCallRefresher on purpose, I can imagine that makes FTP
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
L updated VFS-558:
--
Comment: was deleted
(was: Re: BTW2: do you use OnCallRefresher on purpose, I can imagine that makes
FTP quite slow.
Well, I do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-558?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14281942#comment-14281942
]
L commented on VFS-558:
---
Re: BTW2: do you use OnCallRefresher on purpose, I can imagine that makes FTP
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13418252#comment-13418252
]
J-L commented on DAEMON-235:
Just wanted to give a little update on this story.
This comment
45 matches
Mail list logo
