aooohan commented on PR #182:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-pool/pull/182#issuecomment-1284790607
> You have not addressed my comment on why the locking already provided
through synchronized blocks and synchronized methods is not enough
For this, it's not a synchronization pr
aooohan commented on PR #182:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-pool/pull/182#issuecomment-1284788430
> Then this PR won't make it because:
>
> * You cannot prove anything is wrong
> * You have not addressed my comment on why the locking already provided
through synchronized b
aooohan commented on PR #182:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-pool/pull/182#issuecomment-1284072077
> We can wait until you update this PR with a failing test.
It is somewhat difficult to verify this through unit tests, as there is
nothing to assert and I think it is just a usage
aooohan commented on PR #182:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-pool/pull/182#issuecomment-1283987610
Hi @garydgregory
Sorry for the late reply.
The following is unit test.
```java
try (final GenericObjectPool pool = new
GenericObjectPool<>(new BasePooledObj