MaxKellermann commented on pull request #154:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/154#issuecomment-787464930
Rebased after #158 was merged, dropping its 4 commits.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
MaxKellermann commented on pull request #154:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/154#issuecomment-774619672
> Loom will have to find a solution for it, anyway.
I agree with that. I read that OpenJDK link, and my first thought was: this
is a bad implementation if it makes
MaxKellermann commented on pull request #154:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/154#issuecomment-774433274
> @MaxKellermann, @garydgregory what do you think if we break this PR into a
few other smaller PR's, I think that would be easier to review, and grouping
that way in cas
MaxKellermann commented on pull request #154:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/154#issuecomment-774418907
> Given that the Loom project will likely have issues with `synchronized` in
its first iterations
What kind of problems are caused by `synchronized`? I'm not a Jav
MaxKellermann commented on pull request #154:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/154#issuecomment-762236081
Rebased and fixed conflict because the meanwhile-merged commit
048d34d1e0de11c1ecf44efcae58a225cee1ea96 duplicates my commit
"SoftRefFilesCache: remove unnecessary initi
MaxKellermann commented on pull request #154:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/154#issuecomment-758862303
Rebased and added an extra commit removing the unnecessary initializer, as
requested. (This initializer has been there before, I did not add it, and it
has actually noth
MaxKellermann commented on pull request #154:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/pull/154#issuecomment-756130584
> You mention that there are bugs, ok. But what are they? At the very least
we need a list so users can know if a new release addresses an issue they may
have.
Ea
