Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/209
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/8691246)
Coverage increased (+0.02%) to 93.58% when pulling
**bd9505a01cef8cb6e49eff2
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/209
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/8692938)
Coverage increased (+0.02%) to 93.58% when pulling
**7bddc8759efdde74f6c3da3
Github user kinow commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/209
+1 lgtm
Looks useful, I've wanted that feature a couple of times when using
ReflectionToStringBuilder in the past.
Merging the code locally, the build passes, all reports look go
Github user PascalSchumacher commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/209
Thanks. :smile:
You won't need this to exclude `null` values when using
`ReflectionToStringBuilder`, see https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/259
This will onl
Github user kinow commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/209
Oh, TIL. I think we can't close this pull request, and wait in case a user
needs this feature :+1:
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear o
