Github user mureinik commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/252
@PascalSchumacher no harm done. I'd rather have commons-lang's javadoc
build properly than one patch more or less to my so-called name.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user PascalSchumacher commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/252
@mureinik Sorry it wasn't my intention to steal the authorship of your
commits with the javadoc fixes. :( I wasn't aware that a `git rebase` changes
the author.
---
If your
Github user PascalSchumacher commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/252
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/252
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/10440200)
Coverage decreased (-0.007%) to 94.529% when pulling
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/252
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/10440062)
Coverage decreased (-0.007%) to 94.529% when pulling
