[jira] [Commented] (DAEMON-237) ++JvmOptions processed as --JvmOptions

2012-02-01 Thread Mladen Turk (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13198571#comment-13198571 ] Mladen Turk commented on DAEMON-237: Well, the 1.0.x branch is frozen for new features

[jira] [Commented] (DAEMON-237) ++JvmOptions processed as --JvmOptions

2012-02-01 Thread Sebb (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13198006#comment-13198006 ] Sebb commented on DAEMON-237: - Maybe the code should use names (#define) rather than magic num

[jira] [Commented] (DAEMON-237) ++JvmOptions processed as --JvmOptions

2012-01-30 Thread Sebb (Commented) (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13196157#comment-13196157 ] Sebb commented on DAEMON-237: - The linked Bugzilla issue expects to use ++JvmOptions to update