[jira] [Commented] (EMAIL-68) Donation/Proposal for Commons-Email 2.0

2016-01-02 Thread Siegfried Goeschl (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EMAIL-68?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15076596#comment-15076596 ] Siegfried Goeschl commented on EMAIL-68: My take on 2.0 or 1.x * Having a EmailBuilder which

[jira] [Commented] (EMAIL-68) Donation/Proposal for Commons-Email 2.0

2016-01-02 Thread Siegfried Goeschl (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EMAIL-68?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15076593#comment-15076593 ] Siegfried Goeschl commented on EMAIL-68: EMAIL-160 actually requires JDK 1.6 > Donation/Proposal

[jira] [Commented] (EMAIL-68) Donation/Proposal for Commons-Email 2.0

2015-03-12 Thread JIRA
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EMAIL-68?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14359075#comment-14359075 ] Roman Čičvák commented on EMAIL-68: --- I would suggest to get rid of activation 1.1

[jira] [Commented] (EMAIL-68) Donation/Proposal for Commons-Email 2.0

2015-03-12 Thread Thomas Neidhart (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EMAIL-68?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14359466#comment-14359466 ] Thomas Neidhart commented on EMAIL-68: -- We could get rid of the dependency already for

[jira] [Commented] (EMAIL-68) Donation/Proposal for Commons-Email 2.0

2012-11-07 Thread Thomas Neidhart (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EMAIL-68?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13492759#comment-13492759 ] Thomas Neidhart commented on EMAIL-68: -- A few things I would like to see in

[jira] [Commented] (EMAIL-68) Donation/Proposal for Commons-Email 2.0

2012-11-07 Thread Gary Gregory (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EMAIL-68?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13492894#comment-13492894 ] Gary Gregory commented on EMAIL-68: --- Sounds good to me.