[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17268104#comment-17268104
]
Gary D. Gregory commented on IO-686:
The current Javadoc reads:
{code:java}
/**
* Gets the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17267579#comment-17267579
]
Alan Moffat commented on IO-686:
The original Javadoc explicitly called out the @throws NullPointerExceotion
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17267516#comment-17267516
]
Gary D. Gregory commented on IO-686:
[~themoffster]
This is related to [IO=690], the underlying code in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17194894#comment-17194894
]
Alan Moffat commented on IO-686:
If there was a test for it why did it not fail the build in 2.8.0?
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17194758#comment-17194758
]
Sebb commented on IO-686:
-
It looks like there was a test for the behaviour:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17193855#comment-17193855
]
Gary Gregory commented on IO-686:
-
In general, we make the Javadoc match the code, as the code evolves.
In
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17193809#comment-17193809
]
Alan Moffat commented on IO-686:
[~ggregory] is this expected behaviour then? I ask as it's a bit of a
