[jira] [Commented] (MATH-658) Dead code in FastMath.pow(double, double) and some improvement in test coverage

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13101186#comment-13101186 ] Yannick TANGUY commented on MATH-658: - Ok, here is a new patch for FastMathTest.java : I

[jira] [Commented] (MATH-658) Dead code in FastMath.pow(double, double) and some improvement in test coverage

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13101191#comment-13101191 ] Yannick TANGUY commented on MATH-658: - Sorry, I made the same mistake with Tortoise SVN

[jira] [Commented] (MATH-658) Dead code in FastMath.pow(double, double) and some improvement in test coverage

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13101190#comment-13101190 ] Yannick TANGUY commented on MATH-658: - Sorry, I made the same mistake with Tortoise SVN

[jira] [Commented] (MATH-658) Dead code in FastMath.pow(double, double) and some improvement in test coverage

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13101203#comment-13101203 ] Sebb commented on MATH-658: --- Thanks, format looks OK now. @Luc - sorry, should have noticed the

[jira] [Commented] (MATH-658) Dead code in FastMath.pow(double, double) and some improvement in test coverage

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13101209#comment-13101209 ] Yannick TANGUY commented on MATH-658: - Ok Sebb, I'll put messages in the assertion for

[jira] [Commented] (MATH-658) Dead code in FastMath.pow(double, double) and some improvement in test coverage

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13100397#comment-13100397 ] Sebb commented on MATH-658: --- The body format (3rd line onwards) is OK, but the header lines are

[jira] [Commented] (MATH-658) Dead code in FastMath.pow(double, double) and some improvement in test coverage

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13100405#comment-13100405 ] Yannick TANGUY commented on MATH-658: - Ok, thanks for the tip. I'll do it next time.

[jira] [Commented] (MATH-658) Dead code in FastMath.pow(double, double) and some improvement in test coverage

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13100627#comment-13100627 ] Luc Maisonobe commented on MATH-658: Also try to avoid static imports (and even more

[jira] [Commented] (MATH-658) Dead code in FastMath.pow(double, double) and some improvement in test coverage

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13100734#comment-13100734 ] Sebb commented on MATH-658: --- Thanks - I did see the wildcard import, but left it as it is test

[jira] [Commented] (MATH-658) Dead code in FastMath.pow(double, double) and some improvement in test coverage

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13100746#comment-13100746 ] Sebb commented on MATH-658: --- Also, just noticed some tab characters in the test class patch which

[jira] [Commented] (MATH-658) Dead code in FastMath.pow(double, double) and some improvement in test coverage

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13098316#comment-13098316 ] Luc Maisonobe commented on MATH-658: Could you provide the patch as a unified diff file