Mark Roberts created BCEL-283:
---------------------------------

             Summary: Support for StackMap should be different from 
StackMapTable
                 Key: BCEL-283
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BCEL-283
             Project: Commons BCEL
          Issue Type: Bug
            Reporter: Mark Roberts


It turns out we made a mistake with the StackMap renaming changes.  I ran into 
a problem decoding some old .class files and went back to the Java 
Specification Requests (JSRs) to try and understand the history of the StackMap 
attribute.  While I was not able to get the complete story, I have a pretty 
good guess at what happened and it does explain the problem I have seen.

The official introduction of StackMaps appears to be JSR 202 from (approx.) 
Sept. 2006 and it is part of JDK6 (see attached spec) .   However, StackMaps 
were originally proposed much earlier (approx.) March 2002 - see the attached 
verifier spec.  It appears there were some implementations of this earlier 
specification - the ASM tool was one and there may be others.  

The key differences are: 
Typechecker Spec:       StackMap attribute with fixed format and no frame type 
byte
JDK 6 Spec:             StackMapTable attribute with variable format including 
a frame type byte.

The JVM and the javap tool support BOTH formats.  BCEL recognizes both 
attribute names, but treats them the same, as JDK6 version.

I don't think the changes will be too difficult.  I will create a proposed fix 
within the next few days.




--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to