[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Mark Thomas resolved DAEMON-329. -------------------------------- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 1.1.1 Yes, that is possible. > Can procrun detect the JVM without consulting the registry > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: DAEMON-329 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-329 > Project: Commons Daemon > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Procrun > Affects Versions: 1.0.15 > Environment: Windows Server2012 R2 Java server installed from the > tarball > Reporter: Rod Widdowson > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 1.1.1 > > > For reasons I do not fully comprehend, Oracle distribute the Windows Server > JVM as a tarball. > This means that none of the "usual" registry setting are written. > Our (the Shibboleth protect's) latest IdP release ships with an MSI which > bundles Procrun to launch the J2EE container. We set up the > HKLM\Software\Wow6432Node\Apache Software Key\Procrun 2.0\ appropriately, > specifically setting 'Parameters\Java\JavaHome' appropriately and > 'Parameters\Java\jvm' to 'auto'. I can provide full details available if you > want. > We recently had a customer raise an issue that the autodetect of the jvm.dll > wasn't working. AFAICS this customer installed from the tarball. This is > easily fixed by setting 'jvm' appropriately, and I am modifying our > documentation to explain what to do.. > This RFE is to see if there is anyway that this can be automated inside > procun. It knows the home directory and so it should be able to locate the > jvm.dll. > Thanks -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)