[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Mark Thomas resolved DAEMON-329.
--------------------------------
       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 1.1.1

Yes, that is possible.

> Can procrun detect the JVM without consulting the registry
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DAEMON-329
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-329
>             Project: Commons Daemon
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Procrun
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.15
>         Environment: Windows Server2012 R2 Java server installed from the 
> tarball
>            Reporter: Rod Widdowson
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.1.1
>
>
> For reasons I do not fully comprehend, Oracle distribute the Windows Server 
> JVM as a tarball.
> This means that none of the "usual" registry setting are written.
> Our (the Shibboleth protect's) latest IdP release ships with an MSI which 
> bundles Procrun to launch the J2EE container.  We set up the 
> HKLM\Software\Wow6432Node\Apache Software Key\Procrun 2.0\ appropriately, 
> specifically setting 'Parameters\Java\JavaHome' appropriately and 
> 'Parameters\Java\jvm' to 'auto'.  I can provide full details available if you 
> want.
> We recently had a customer raise an issue that the autodetect of the jvm.dll 
> wasn't working.  AFAICS this customer installed from the tarball.  This is 
> easily fixed by setting 'jvm' appropriately, and I am modifying our 
> documentation to explain what to do..
> This RFE is to see if there is anyway that this can be automated inside 
> procun.  It knows the home directory and so it should be able to locate the 
> jvm.dll.
> Thanks



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to