[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-89?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12979294#action_12979294
]
ant elder commented on CODEC-89:
Just as an FYI we had another user in Abdera impacted by
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-89?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12842656#action_12842656
]
Keegan Witt commented on CODEC-89:
--
This is also present for non-empty constructors, which
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-89?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12842711#action_12842711
]
Keegan Witt commented on CODEC-89:
--
My apologies, I was calling a static method from an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-89?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12804463#action_12804463
]
Nikolas Falco commented on CODEC-89:
I quote Daniel Fernández, we have the same problem.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-89?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12801703#action_12801703
]
Daniel Fernández commented on CODEC-89:
---
I am the lead developer of Jasypt
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-89?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12801707#action_12801707
]
Matthias commented on CODEC-89:
---
I can only second that.
I'm the developer of the Signpost
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-89?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12801870#action_12801870
]
Henri Yandell commented on CODEC-89:
+1 to a 1.4.1 release that goes back to the 1.3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-89?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12784741#action_12784741
]
Mat Booth commented on CODEC-89:
Note that the behaviour of
new Base64(0).encode()
is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-89?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12785109#action_12785109
]
Sebb commented on CODEC-89:
---
Patch (dated 2009-10-28 04:52 PM) looks OK, except I think it looks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-89?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12785116#action_12785116
]
Sebb commented on CODEC-89:
---
Having second thoughts - although the patch looks OK, it actually
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-89?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12784460#action_12784460
]
Mat Booth commented on CODEC-89:
I'd prefer to see a 1.4.1 release with the old behaviour. It
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-89?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12784589#action_12784589
]
Sebb commented on CODEC-89:
---
Note that the behaviour of
new Base64(0).encode()
is the same as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-89?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12781274#action_12781274
]
Gary Gregory commented on CODEC-89:
---
What a pickle. The current behavior is documented in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-89?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12781295#action_12781295
]
Julius Davies commented on CODEC-89:
Could we put out a fix as 1.4.1 ?
new
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-89?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12781305#action_12781305
]
Gary Gregory commented on CODEC-89:
---
I see a change for a 1.4.1 or a 1.5 as the same issue
15 matches
Mail list logo