[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15731472#comment-15731472
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-5226:
---
Github user fhueske commented on a diff in the pull
Github user fhueske commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2926#discussion_r91460589
--- Diff:
flink-libraries/flink-table/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/api/table/plan/nodes/dataset/DataSetCalc.scala
---
@@ -73,7 +75,11 @@ class
Github user beyond1920 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2926#discussion_r91455098
--- Diff:
flink-libraries/flink-table/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/api/table/plan/nodes/dataset/DataSetCalc.scala
---
@@ -73,7 +75,11 @@ class
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15731343#comment-15731343
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-5226:
---
Github user beyond1920 commented on a diff in the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2821?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15731314#comment-15731314
]
Philipp von dem Bussche commented on FLINK-2821:
Hello [~mxm], some more feedback on my
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15731208#comment-15731208
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-4883:
---
Github user Renkai commented on the issue:
Github user Renkai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2729
Hi, @aljoscha keep a balance in freedom and safety is really a hardwork. I
think we could just give a warning to users, but fail and exit directly.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15731158#comment-15731158
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-4997:
---
Github user aljoscha commented on the issue:
Github user aljoscha commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2756
@manuzhang I finished reviewing and the code is good to go but I'm
currently adding more tests before merging this because I realised that we are
lacking there a bit.
See
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15731132#comment-15731132
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-4997:
---
Github user manuzhang commented on the issue:
Github user manuzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2756
@VenturaDelMonte Any updates here ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user KurtYoung opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2961
[FLINK-5266] [table] eagerly project unused fields when selecting
aggregation fields
This PR is based on #2926 , only the second commit is related.
I add a "plan" test directory to hold
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5266?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15730904#comment-15730904
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-5266:
---
GitHub user KurtYoung opened a pull request:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15730815#comment-15730815
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-5220:
---
Github user beyond1920 commented on a diff in the pull
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15730809#comment-15730809
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-5220:
---
Github user beyond1920 commented on the issue:
Github user beyond1920 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2923#discussion_r91429660
--- Diff:
flink-libraries/flink-table/src/main/scala/org/apache/flink/api/table/plan/nodes/dataset/BatchScan.scala
---
@@ -45,7 +45,8 @@ abstract class
Github user beyond1920 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2923
@fhueske , thanks for your review. I have already modified the pr based on
your advice, including following main changes:
1. Adapt the cost model for the BatchTableSourceScan
2. Modify
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5226?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15730719#comment-15730719
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-5226:
---
Github user KurtYoung commented on the issue:
Github user KurtYoung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2926
Cool, LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4992?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15730286#comment-15730286
]
Jamie Grier commented on FLINK-4992:
Another use case here is just simply attaching whatever data you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3871?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15730136#comment-15730136
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3871:
---
Github user mushketyk commented on the issue:
Github user mushketyk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2762
Hi @fhueske ,
Sorry, I am still relatively new to Flink so I don't have the full context.
Could you elaborate why this is an issue and how does this shortcoming affect
this PR?
Github user mushketyk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2564
Hi @greghogan,
I've updated the PR according to your review and rebased it on top of the
`master` branch.
The only thing that I didn't change is the message in the `assertEquals`
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-2254?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15730132#comment-15730132
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-2254:
---
Github user mushketyk commented on the issue:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefan Richter reassigned FLINK-5283:
-
Assignee: Stefan Richter
> InputStream should be closed in
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ted Yu updated FLINK-5283:
--
Description:
{code}
HashMap namedStates =
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ted Yu updated FLINK-5283:
--
Description:
{code}
HashMap namedStates =
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ted Yu updated FLINK-5283:
--
Summary: InputStream should be closed in
RocksDBKeyedStateBackend#restoreOldSavepointKeyedState (was:
Ted Yu created FLINK-5283:
-
Summary: CheckpointStateOutputStream should be closed in finally
block in SavepointV0Serializer#convertKeyedBackendState()
Key: FLINK-5283
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5283
Ted Yu created FLINK-5282:
-
Summary: CheckpointStateOutputStream should be closed in finally
block in SavepointV0Serializer#convertKeyedBackendState()
Key: FLINK-5282
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5282
Github user fhueske commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2762
Hi @mushketyk, while reviewing your PR I noticed a significant shortcoming
of the `TableSource` interface. `TableSource` does not support nested schemas.
IMO, this needs to be fixed before we can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3871?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15729420#comment-15729420
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-3871:
---
Github user fhueske commented on the issue:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2919
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15729407#comment-15729407
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-4554:
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timo Walther resolved FLINK-4554.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.2.0
Fixed in 4414008551b2843d98b3caddbb171fa1934e1f40.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3871?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Fabian Hueske updated FLINK-3871:
-
Description:
Add a Kafka TableSource which supports Avro serialized data.
The
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15729396#comment-15729396
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-4554:
---
Github user twalthr commented on the issue:
Github user twalthr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2919
Merging...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user fhueske commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2919
Thanks for the update.
+1 to merge.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15729394#comment-15729394
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-4554:
---
Github user fhueske commented on the issue:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15729389#comment-15729389
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-4554:
---
Github user twalthr commented on the issue:
Github user twalthr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2919
Thanks for reviewing my PR. I hope I addressed all your comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Fabian Hueske created FLINK-5281:
Summary: Extend KafkaJsonTableSources to support nested data
Key: FLINK-5281
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5281
Project: Flink
Issue
Fabian Hueske created FLINK-5280:
Summary: Extend TableSource to support nested data
Key: FLINK-5280
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5280
Project: Flink
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15729286#comment-15729286
]
Ufuk Celebi commented on FLINK-5278:
Merged in b046038 (release-1.1). Merge for master pending.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15729278#comment-15729278
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-5278:
---
Github user uce commented on the issue:
Ufuk Celebi created FLINK-5279:
--
Summary: Improve error message when trying to access keyed state
in non-keyed operator
Key: FLINK-5279
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5279
Project:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15729209#comment-15729209
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-5114:
---
Github user uce commented on the issue:
Github user uce commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2913
I removed the `findExecutionAttemptWithId` and only check the latest
attempt. If that does not match the expected producer attempt, I answer with a
`PartitionProducerDisposedException` to which the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Timo Walther resolved FLINK-4469.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.2.0
Fixed in 684defbf33168e34657bc1a25607adb53be248c5.
Github user mxm closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2951
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mxm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2951
Sorry, I missed your comment. We can open another PR to clarify that!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user mindprince commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2951
Also, this PR is open but the change is already there in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15729153#comment-15729153
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-5278:
---
GitHub user tillrohrmann opened a pull request:
GitHub user tillrohrmann opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2960
[backport] [FLINK-5278] Improve task and checkpoint related logging
Backport of #2959 for release-1.1.
Improve logging of Task and checkpoint logic.
cc @uce
You can merge
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15729152#comment-15729152
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-5278:
---
GitHub user tillrohrmann opened a pull request:
GitHub user tillrohrmann opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2959
[FLINK-5278] Improve task and checkpoint related logging
Improve logging of Task and checkpoint logic.
cc @uce
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
Github user mindprince closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2954
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mindprince commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2954
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user uce closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2955
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5274?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ufuk Celebi closed FLINK-5274.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.1.4
1.2.0
555a687 (master), 1b472d2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5275?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ufuk Celebi closed FLINK-5275.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.1.4
1.2.0
4410c04 (master), 4526005
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ufuk Celebi closed FLINK-5276.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed in 75b48e (release-1.1)
> ExecutionVertex archiving can throw NPE with many
Github user uce closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2957
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15729109#comment-15729109
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-5276:
---
Github user uce closed the pull request at:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15729094#comment-15729094
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-4469:
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2653
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15729081#comment-15729081
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-4469:
---
Github user twalthr commented on the issue:
Github user twalthr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2653
Thanks. Merging...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3850?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15729014#comment-15729014
]
Fabian Hueske commented on FLINK-3850:
--
The annotations do not need to be code generated.
They
Till Rohrmann created FLINK-5278:
Summary: Improve Task and checkpoint logging
Key: FLINK-5278
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5278
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15728924#comment-15728924
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-5059:
---
Github user NicoK commented on a diff in the pull request:
Github user NicoK commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2805#discussion_r91306180
--- Diff:
flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/io/network/api/writer/RecordWriter.java
---
@@ -131,35 +132,30 @@ private void sendToTarget(T
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nico Kruber reassigned FLINK-5277:
--
Assignee: Nico Kruber
> missing unit test for ensuring ResultPartition#add always recycles
Nico Kruber created FLINK-5277:
--
Summary: missing unit test for ensuring ResultPartition#add always
recycles buffers
Key: FLINK-5277
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5277
Project: Flink
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3850?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15728834#comment-15728834
]
Nikolay Vasilishin commented on FLINK-3850:
---
Hi, [~fhueske]!
I've read a topic about forward
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4704?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15728764#comment-15728764
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-4704:
---
GitHub user ex00 opened a pull request:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15728763#comment-15728763
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-5276:
---
Github user StefanRRichter commented on the issue:
GitHub user ex00 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2958
[FLINK-4704] Move Table API to org.apache.flink.table
Thanks for contributing to Apache Flink. Before you open your pull request,
please take the following check list into consideration.
If your
Github user StefanRRichter commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2957
LGTM +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15728761#comment-15728761
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-5276:
---
GitHub user uce opened a pull request:
GitHub user uce opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2957
[FLINK-5276] [eg] Check for null when archiving prior execution attempts
The `EvictingBoundedList` returns the default value for all evicted
elements. This could lead to NPE when archiving an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ufuk Celebi reassigned FLINK-5276:
--
Assignee: Ufuk Celebi (was: Stefan Richter)
> ExecutionVertex archiving can throw NPE with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15728747#comment-15728747
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-5223:
---
GitHub user wuchong opened a pull request:
GitHub user wuchong opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2956
[FLINK-5223] [doc] Add documentation of UDTF in Table API & SQL
Thanks for contributing to Apache Flink. Before you open your pull request,
please take the following check list into consideration.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ufuk Celebi updated FLINK-5276:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.2.0)
> ExecutionVertex archiving can throw NPE with many previous attempts
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5276?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ufuk Celebi updated FLINK-5276:
---
Description:
I saw a NPE while archiving a ExecutionVertex:
{code}
execution graph
Github user mxm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2954
Merged in c024b0b6cae16a0b668d864c77e923820c262087 but forgot to include
the "This closes #2954" message in the commit, could you close the PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2781
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5041?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15728721#comment-15728721
]
Ufuk Celebi commented on FLINK-5041:
Subtasks FLINK-5042 and FLINK-5043 implemented in in af3bf83
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5041?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15728719#comment-15728719
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-5041:
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ufuk Celebi closed FLINK-5043.
--
Resolution: Implemented
Fix Version/s: 1.2.0
Implemented in af3bf83 (master).
> Converting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5042?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ufuk Celebi closed FLINK-5042.
--
Resolution: Implemented
Fix Version/s: 1.2.0
Implemented in af3bf83 (master).
> Convert old
Ufuk Celebi created FLINK-5276:
--
Summary: ExecutionVertex archiving can throw NPE with many
previous attempts
Key: FLINK-5276
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5276
Project: Flink
GitHub user uce opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2955
[backport] Improve some follow up exceptions
Improves follow up Exceptions when the job failed in a different place:
1) Check partition state if returned buffer is null in `LocalInputChannel`.
Ufuk Celebi created FLINK-5275:
--
Summary: InputChanelDeploymentDescriptors throws misleading
Exception if producer failed/cancelled
Key: FLINK-5275
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5275
Ufuk Celebi created FLINK-5274:
--
Summary: LocalInputChannel throws NPE if partition reader is
released
Key: FLINK-5274
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5274
Project: Flink
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3850?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15728604#comment-15728604
]
Fabian Hueske commented on FLINK-3850:
--
Thanks for picking up this issue [~nvasilishin]!
Please let
Github user aljoscha commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2729
The problem is that this doesn't even work if the user correctly implements
a thread safe UDF. If the UDF is an object then things such as the
`RuntimeContext` will be the same for different
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-4883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15728598#comment-15728598
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on FLINK-4883:
---
Github user aljoscha commented on the issue:
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo