[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17596924#comment-17596924
]
Ron Crocker commented on FLINK-29108:
-
[~gyfora] I can accept starting with "extend operator via
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29108?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17585531#comment-17585531
]
Ron Crocker commented on FLINK-29108:
-
[~masteryhx] In a word, yes.
There's two things in play:
#
Ron Crocker created FLINK-29108:
---
Summary: Kubernetes operator: Support queryable state
Key: FLINK-29108
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-29108
Project: Flink
Issue Type: New
Ron Crocker created FLINK-8127:
--
Summary: Add New Relic Metric Reporter
Key: FLINK-8127
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8127
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Improvement
Ron Crocker created FLINK-8074:
--
Summary: Launch Flink jobs using Maven coordinates
Key: FLINK-8074
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-8074
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15226504#comment-15226504
]
Ron Crocker commented on FLINK-3697:
[~rmetzger] This code is fine to use for your test case.
The
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ron Crocker updated FLINK-3697:
---
Description:
Using named keys in keyBy() for nested POJO types results in failure. The
iindexes for
Ron Crocker created FLINK-3697:
--
Summary: keyBy() with nested POJO computes invalid field position
indexes
Key: FLINK-3697
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3697
Project: Flink
