jbusche commented on PR #600:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/pull/600#issuecomment-1550186662
Looks good on OpenShift with OLM and also with the regular helm install:
```
oc get pods
NAME READY
jbusche commented on PR #600:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/pull/600#issuecomment-1550101538
Testing now, both with helm installs (OpenShift and regular Kubernetes) and
OLM installs. Will post results.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
jbusche commented on PR #600:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/pull/600#issuecomment-1550096776
Sure @mbalassi, I'll re-test it again to make sure...
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
jbusche commented on PR #600:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/pull/600#issuecomment-1548743480
OpenShift 4.10.54 is looking good with the PR:
```
oc get pods,flinkdeployments -n default
jbusche commented on PR #600:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/pull/600#issuecomment-1548682654
OK - the KIND cluster looks good - still deploying the samples fine.
```
NAME READY STATUS
RESTARTS AGE
jbusche commented on PR #600:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/pull/600#issuecomment-1548632061
Trying a new deployment on both a KIND cluster (non OpenShift) as well as
two OpenShift clusters to verify the change. Will post results here.
--
This is an automated
