[GitHub] NicoK commented on issue #7445: [FLINK-11154][network] bump Netty to 4.1.32

NicoK commented on issue #7445: [FLINK-11154][network] bump Netty to 4.1.32 URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/7445#issuecomment-461012748 New benchmarks based on the changes in https://github.com/dataArtisans/flink-benchmarks (also including SSL benchmarks) do not reveal any perfor

[GitHub] NicoK commented on issue #7445: [FLINK-11154][network] bump Netty to 4.1.32

NicoK commented on issue #7445: [FLINK-11154][network] bump Netty to 4.1.32 URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/7445#issuecomment-456717099 @zhijiangW can you also have a quick look and verify that this upgrade is not interrupting anything? ---

[GitHub] NicoK commented on issue #7445: [FLINK-11154][network] bump Netty to 4.1.32

NicoK commented on issue #7445: [FLINK-11154][network] bump Netty to 4.1.32 URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/7445#issuecomment-454715318 TL;DR: no performance changes for the current code base --- comparing `master` from 15th Jan with this branch, 30 samples each: ```

[GitHub] NicoK commented on issue #7445: [FLINK-11154][network] bump Netty to 4.1.32

NicoK commented on issue #7445: [FLINK-11154][network] bump Netty to 4.1.32 URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/7445#issuecomment-454412362 https://github.com/apache/flink-shaded/pull/55 has been merged, benchmarks ran with the following results (comparing `master` from 9th Jan with t