Github user mxm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2313
Thanks for helpful review @tillrohrmann and @rmetzger.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user mxm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2313
Rebased to the changes on master. Merging after tests pass again.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user mxm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2313
Merging this if there are no further comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user mxm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2313
Updated according to our comment discussion.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
ena
Github user mxm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2313
I've made the last changes concerning the lazy reconstruction of the class
loader we discussed. Rebased to master. Should be good to go now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user mxm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2313
@tillrohrmann Pinging the actor now to check if it is still alive. Also
added another test case for that.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user mxm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2313
@tillrohrmann I've refactored the JobClientActor to include the common code
in `JobClientActorBase` and have implementations for submitting/attaching in
`JobSubmissionClientActor` and `JobAttachmentClien
Github user mxm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2313
Thanks for the review @tillrohrmann. Yes, the plan is to have a `JobClient`
API class (the existing JobClient class will be renamed) which uses the
SubmissionContext to supervise submitted jobs or attach
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2313
Good work @mxm. I made some minor comments inline.
Just for my own clarification: Is it still planned to have a new kind of
`JobClient` which is bound to a specific job and which can be
Github user rmetzger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2313
I did a quick pass over the code. I think this change needs another review
by our Actor expert @tillrohrmann ;)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user mxm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2313
CC @rmetzger @tillrohrmann Could you please take a look? I would like to
merge this. Tests are passing: https://travis-ci.org/mxm/flink/builds/151653198
---
If your project is set up for it, you can rep
11 matches
Mail list logo
