Github user StephanEwen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2354
Have to rerun tests on this one. The Scala API completeness check failed,
so I had to adjust it.
Will merge pending successful tests...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user StephanEwen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2354
Merging this...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, o
Github user StephanEwen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2354
Yes, this is good, thanks!
+1 to merge this
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user aljoscha commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2354
IMHO this looks good to merge now. ð
@StephanEwen what do you think?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If y
Github user wuchong commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2354
Hi @aljoscha @StephanEwen , I add a `forceNonParallel` method to
`SingleOutputStreamOperator`. I think subclassing SingleOutputStreamOperator
is a little unnecessary.
---
If your project is set up
Github user aljoscha commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2354
Something like `NonParallelSingleOutputStreamOperator` but that's quite a
mouthful. (`SingleOutputStreamOperator` is already too long for my taste ...).
Or maybe `NonParallelStreamOperator`.
Github user wuchong commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2354
Thanks for advice. Do you have any ideas about the subclass's naming.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user StephanEwen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2354
I agree with Aljoscha, there may be more operators that need to constrain
the parallelism. So a more generic solution would be good.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user aljoscha commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2354
Hi,
thanks for tackling this. I think the way to go about this is by
subclassing `SingleOutputStreamOperator` and overriding `setParallelism` there.
---
If your project is set up for it, you ca
