Github user StephanEwen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2753
A gentle ping about how to proceed here...
Are you interested in pursuing another implementation approach, or should
we close this as "fix later"?
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user StephanEwen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2753
I think we need a different way to solve this.
This pull request adds a very high overhead to the processing of each
record:
- two calls to `System.nanoTime()`
- Maintining a
