Github user tillrohrmann commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6240
Nice, thank you. Merging this PR.
---
Github user GJL commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6240
I extended the regular `README.md`.
---
Github user GJL commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6240
It seems that we have to stick with `0.1.8` for now. According to legal,
there are no concerns so far: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-392
---
Github user GJL commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6240
`0.1.9.` was problematic. Currently testing `0.1.10`.
---
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6240
Gary is reaching out to Apache legal to ask for advice how to handle the
SOLIPSISTIC license. Apparently, we cannot easily upgrade to `0.1.10` because
it contains a bug.
---
Github user zentol commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6240
Note that this may also imply that the files that we add cannot be apache
licensed, but I'm not completely sure about that.
---
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6240
I think you are right @zentol because we are linking against Jepsen `0.1.8`
and Jepsen was licensed under EPL only in version `0.1.10`.
---
Github user zentol commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6240
My information is outdated, they updated the license roughly a month ago to
EPL:
https://github.com/jepsen-io/jepsen/commit/d9c8530b7a2deac2389d93639581dfa1ff0f08fc
---
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6240
Where exactly do you see the license conflicts @zentol? We do not include
Jepsen code in our repository and since it is licensed under EPL 1.0 we should
be able to link against it.
---
Github user zentol commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6240
The jepsen license is not compatible with the apache license and thus must
be part of the release.
---
Github user tillrohrmann commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6240
Concerning @zentol's comment: We also include the `flink-end-to-end-tests`
in the source release. Therefore, I think we could also include the
jepsen-tests in the src release. Especially since
Github user GJL commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/6240
As @zentol mentioned, we might want to exclude this from
create_source_release.sh.
---
12 matches
Mail list logo