Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/627
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl
Github user fhueske commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/627#issuecomment-98781884
Any objections against merging this PR?
Otherwise, I'll do that tomorrow.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user fhueske commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/627#issuecomment-96631688
Yes, very good point.
I replaced the `.print()` statements by `.output(new
DiscardingOutputFormat()` as suggested (not only in the ported tests but also
some more on t
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/627#issuecomment-96580250
Wow, very nice :-) Looks correct from a first glance (I did not thoroughly
check everything).
One remark: Since `print()` may become an eagerly evaluated comma
GitHub user fhueske opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/627
[FLINK-1682] Ported optimizer unit tests from Record API to Java API
This is a step towards removing the deprecated Record API.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
