[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-1874] [streaming] Connector breakup

2015-05-23 Thread mbalassi
GitHub user mbalassi opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/719 [FLINK-1874] [streaming] Connector breakup Connectors separated into maven modules, named e.g. flink-kafka-connector. Plus an additional commit to remove the flume connector from the docs f

[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-1874] [streaming] Connector breakup

2015-05-23 Thread rmetzger
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/719#issuecomment-104872808 Great, thank you for fixing this. I'll soon review it! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well

[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-1874] [streaming] Connector breakup

2015-05-27 Thread rmetzger
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/719#issuecomment-105914769 I'm not so sure about the module names. The parent is called. `flink-streaming-connectors-parent` The modules itself are called: ```diff + +

[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-1874] [streaming] Connector breakup

2015-05-27 Thread StephanEwen
Github user StephanEwen commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/719#issuecomment-105926196 Should we so clearly differentiate between the streaming and the batch connector projects? Why not have a `flink-connector-kafka` that contains both a batch a

[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-1874] [streaming] Connector breakup

2015-05-28 Thread mbalassi
Github user mbalassi commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/719#issuecomment-106203949 I added the `parent` suffix to the main pom, because that is how we tend to name modules not containing source code themselves. Then I have realized that the name is bec

[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-1874] [streaming] Connector breakup

2015-05-28 Thread rmetzger
Github user rmetzger commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/719#issuecomment-106285952 Okay, I agree with you that we can name the modules the way marton suggested it. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply a

[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-1874] [streaming] Connector breakup

2015-05-28 Thread mbalassi
Github user mbalassi commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/719#issuecomment-106299970 Thanks, merging as soon as travis verifies. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proje

[GitHub] flink pull request: [FLINK-1874] [streaming] Connector breakup

2015-05-28 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/719 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl