becketqin merged PR #23865:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/23865
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
pvary commented on PR #23865:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/23865#issuecomment-1853315289
@becketqin: Thanks for the example changes! They really help to make sense
of the previous table.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
becketqin commented on PR #23865:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/23865#issuecomment-1853288782
@pvary Sorry for the late response. I read the section a few times and found
that the compatibility guarantee statement itself is actually concise and
accurate. However, the the
pvary commented on code in PR #23865:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/23865#discussion_r1415756044
##
docs/content/docs/ops/upgrading.md:
##
@@ -60,6 +60,32 @@ Code written against a `PublicEvolving` API in 1.15.2 will
continue to run in 1.
That same code would have
pvary commented on code in PR #23865:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/23865#discussion_r1415756044
##
docs/content/docs/ops/upgrading.md:
##
@@ -60,6 +60,32 @@ Code written against a `PublicEvolving` API in 1.15.2 will
continue to run in 1.
That same code would have
pvary commented on PR #23865:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/23865#issuecomment-1840787769
I would suggest to change the
[previous](https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-docs-master/docs/ops/upgrading/#api-compatibility-guarantees)
paragraph, like the following (remove the
gaborgsomogyi commented on PR #23865:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/23865#issuecomment-1840452321
Thanks for the explanation!
> In terms of the source / binary compatibility, the main reason we do not
provide binary compatibility in minor releases for any API stability
becketqin commented on PR #23865:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/23865#issuecomment-1839717057
@pvary @mbalassi @gaborgsomogyi @JingGe Thanks a lot for the reviews.
From what I understand, FLIP-321 does not change the API stability
guarantee, it only specifies a migration
gaborgsomogyi commented on PR #23865:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/23865#issuecomment-1838941714
I've had an in-depth look on the compatibility guarantee matrix together
with the deprecation policy and here are my findings:
* The doc basically looks good from content
mbalassi commented on PR #23865:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/23865#issuecomment-1838566349
Thanks for the quick turnaround, @becketqin. I agree with @pvary that we
should adjust the [table just
pvary commented on PR #23865:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/23865#issuecomment-1838229419
@becketqin: We might want to edit the previous section too.
I think it is a bit misleading when we state there that a `PublicEvolving`
API is not source/binary compatible across
JingGe commented on code in PR #23865:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/23865#discussion_r1413472466
##
docs/content/docs/ops/upgrading.md:
##
@@ -60,6 +60,32 @@ Code written against a `PublicEvolving` API in 1.15.2 will
continue to run in 1.
That same code would
JingGe commented on code in PR #23865:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/23865#discussion_r1413472466
##
docs/content/docs/ops/upgrading.md:
##
@@ -60,6 +60,32 @@ Code written against a `PublicEvolving` API in 1.15.2 will
continue to run in 1.
That same code would
flinkbot commented on PR #23865:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/23865#issuecomment-1837911822
## CI report:
* aa4d7a5834e436ea8374efd610bb1e257a9ed5af UNKNOWN
Bot commands
The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:
- `@flinkbot run azure`
becketqin commented on PR #23865:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/23865#issuecomment-1837910118
@mbalassi Do you have time to take a look at the doc update? Thanks!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
becketqin opened a new pull request, #23865:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/23865
## What is the purpose of the change
This PR update the ops doc to add the migration periods for deprecated APIs,
which are specified in
16 matches
Mail list logo
